2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.scib.2017.11.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrochemical probing into the active sites of graphitic-layer encapsulated iron oxygen reduction reaction electrocatalysts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the diffractograms of Fe-N-ox-V (marked black) and Fe-N-aPRS KOH (marked blue) have low intensity but sharp peaks beside the carbon peaks in the range of 40–50°. Those cannot be properly identified due to small intensity but are presumed to be assigned to metallic Fe or Fe 3 C as reported in the literature [ 12 , 57 , 58 ]. Furthermore, the C (002) reflection becomes sharper for the Fe-N-aPRS KOH sample.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the diffractograms of Fe-N-ox-V (marked black) and Fe-N-aPRS KOH (marked blue) have low intensity but sharp peaks beside the carbon peaks in the range of 40–50°. Those cannot be properly identified due to small intensity but are presumed to be assigned to metallic Fe or Fe 3 C as reported in the literature [ 12 , 57 , 58 ]. Furthermore, the C (002) reflection becomes sharper for the Fe-N-aPRS KOH sample.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous work verified that CoN bond showed remarkable effect in ORR . In order to eliminate the contribution of CoN bonds which derived from the nitrogenous precursor (Figure S4d, Supporting Information), the CoP–DC was first dipped in 10 × 10 −3 m KSCN solution for 60 min to restrain the catalytic activity of CoN species and then tested in 0.1 m KOH for ORR . As shown in Figure S10 of the Supporting Information, LSV curves of CoP–DC and KSCN treated CoP–DC show ignorable difference, indicating the ORR performance was mainly contributed by the synergistic effect of CoP and DC rather than CoN bonds .…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Meanwhile, the poisoning trend of Ru Δc→h /C < Ru Δhcp /C < Ru hcp /C < Ru ccp /C suggests that the RuC X phase on Ru Δc→h /C and Ru Δhcp /C may play a role in the catalysis and that these nanoparticles are not considerably affected by anion poisoning. [ 52 ] In addition, the stronger SCN – poisoning for Ru Δhcp /C than for Ru Δc→h /C implicated the different positions of the RuC X phase on their surfaces. Together with the XPS, HRPES analyses, and DFT calculations noted above, this less poisoning effect observed for Ru Δc→h /C can be another clear evidence for the well formation of RuC X on the surface of Ru Δc→h /C.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%