2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.corsci.2007.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrochemical reactivation methods applied to PM austenitic stainless steels sintered in nitrogen–hydrogen atmosphere

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 675°C temperature was the typical critical sensitization temperature for austenitic stainless steels [28]. For 316L N also high DOS was registered with a clear increase of EPR data with sensitization time but it was noticed that the precipitation and subsequent sensitization occurred faster when the sensitization temperature was increased up to 875°C, differing with what is expected for wrought stainless steels.…”
Section: Electrochemical Potentio-kinetic Reactivation Test (Epr)mentioning
confidence: 39%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The 675°C temperature was the typical critical sensitization temperature for austenitic stainless steels [28]. For 316L N also high DOS was registered with a clear increase of EPR data with sensitization time but it was noticed that the precipitation and subsequent sensitization occurred faster when the sensitization temperature was increased up to 875°C, differing with what is expected for wrought stainless steels.…”
Section: Electrochemical Potentio-kinetic Reactivation Test (Epr)mentioning
confidence: 39%
“…Previous works [14,28,29] indicate that Q r parameter is recommended to be used instead of I r since the former is an integration value while the latter is just a point value. Additionally, due to the porosity, the real current density cannot be correctly estimated.…”
Section: Electrochemical Potentio-kinetic Reactivation Test (Epr)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A previous study of immersed PIM 316L SS parts in 3% NaCl solution for 78 days and found that 316L SS displayed pitting corrosion because of pores present in 316L SS (Sobral et al 2001). Another study investigated the effects of sintering atmosphere on pitting corrosion resistance of 316L SS produced by powder metallurgy (PM); the authors found that vacuum sintering helped to attain high density and better corrosion resistance compared with gas sintering (García et al 2008(García et al , 2007. In gas-sintered samples, lamellar components form.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%