2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jes.2020.08.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrochemical reduction of Cr(VI) in the presence of sodium alginate and its application in water purification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, in a previous investigation, we investigated the electrochemical reduction of Cr(VI) to Cr(III) in the presence of SA and the subsequent removal of the produced Cr(III)-SA by PEUF. 47 The results demonstrated that SA is an effective WSP for the elimination of contaminating species through PEUF with a metal ion adsorption efficiency of 100%. It is posited that the adsorption efficiency is strongly influenced by the structural functional groups of SA that capture cationic species, namely, COO − and OH − , for removal from the solution according to studies of PEUF with assistance from SA for the retention of metals such as Fe(III) 48 and of AA as a WSP for the retention of Cu(II), Fe(III), 49 Ag(II), Co(II), Ni(II), Cu(II), Zn(II), Cd(II), and Pb(II).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Therefore, in a previous investigation, we investigated the electrochemical reduction of Cr(VI) to Cr(III) in the presence of SA and the subsequent removal of the produced Cr(III)-SA by PEUF. 47 The results demonstrated that SA is an effective WSP for the elimination of contaminating species through PEUF with a metal ion adsorption efficiency of 100%. It is posited that the adsorption efficiency is strongly influenced by the structural functional groups of SA that capture cationic species, namely, COO − and OH − , for removal from the solution according to studies of PEUF with assistance from SA for the retention of metals such as Fe(III) 48 and of AA as a WSP for the retention of Cu(II), Fe(III), 49 Ag(II), Co(II), Ni(II), Cu(II), Zn(II), Cd(II), and Pb(II).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…3,4 In addition to geological reasons, chromium also enters drinking water resources through pollution from multiple industries (e.g., chrome plating, leather tanning etc.). 5 In aqueous solutions, chromium is present in the neutral pH range as trivalent (Cr(III)) or hexavalent form (Cr(VI)). 6 While Cr(III) compounds in small amounts are essential for metabolic processes in the human body, Cr(VI) compounds are highly problematic as they are carcinogenic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 However, these technologies are complex to operate and expensive due to high operation costs. 5 For these reasons, the removal of chromium from drinking water sources is still a problem today in many regions of the world.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the comprehensive sewage discharge standard GB 8978 − 1996 stipulates that the maximum acceptable emission concentration of Cu 2+ is 0.5 mg/L. The treatment methods for heavy metals in wastewater include: chemical method [6], adsorption [7,8], electro-dialysis [9,10], ion exchange method [7,11], photocatalysis methods [12,13], and etc. With the adsorption method's advantages such as economic, simple and easy to operate, and wide scope of application, the research and development of green adsorption materials with good performance and speci c selectivity is becoming an important trend of controlling heavy metal pollution and recycling of resources [14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%