2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.03.062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrochemical reforming of ethanol–water solutions for pure H2 production in a PEM electrolysis cell

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
94
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(112 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
17
94
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Catalytic steam reforming Advantages • Lower reaction temperatures (<100 • C) making possible a rapid startup • Low toxicity • Direct pure hydrogen production, separated from other reaction products • Easier and fast control of hydrogen production rate • Compact unit combining both reaction and hydrogen purification with a consequent capital costs reduction • High renewable energy integration • Reduced environmental impact • Seasonal energy storage without energy losses • Capability to handle power fluctuations by H2 production • Lower power demands than water electrolysis, since part of the energy required is provided by the organic molecule this context, recent studies have shown that the electrochemical reforming of water-alcohol mixtures, i.e., methanol [5][6][7][8], glycerol [9,10], ethanol [11,12], bioethanol [13,14] and ethylene glycol [15] has a great potential for H 2 production at atmospheric pressure. The use of such compounds allows electrolysis at potentials lower than 1.2 V, leading to electrical power savings if compared to conventional electrolytic water splitting.…”
Section: Electrochemical Reforming Of Alcoholsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Catalytic steam reforming Advantages • Lower reaction temperatures (<100 • C) making possible a rapid startup • Low toxicity • Direct pure hydrogen production, separated from other reaction products • Easier and fast control of hydrogen production rate • Compact unit combining both reaction and hydrogen purification with a consequent capital costs reduction • High renewable energy integration • Reduced environmental impact • Seasonal energy storage without energy losses • Capability to handle power fluctuations by H2 production • Lower power demands than water electrolysis, since part of the energy required is provided by the organic molecule this context, recent studies have shown that the electrochemical reforming of water-alcohol mixtures, i.e., methanol [5][6][7][8], glycerol [9,10], ethanol [11,12], bioethanol [13,14] and ethylene glycol [15] has a great potential for H 2 production at atmospheric pressure. The use of such compounds allows electrolysis at potentials lower than 1.2 V, leading to electrical power savings if compared to conventional electrolytic water splitting.…”
Section: Electrochemical Reforming Of Alcoholsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Replacing anodic oxygen evolution with the oxidation of much more readily oxidizable species leads to a significant reduction of the potential required to produce hydrogen. Following this strategy, compounds such as ammonia 7,8 , methanol 9 , ethanol [10][11][12][13] , glycerol 14,15 and urea 16 have been recently tested. These electrolytic processes that lead to the concomitant generation of chemicals at the anode and hydrogen at the cathode are often indicated as 'electrochemical reforming'.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In line with previous studies [15], an increase in the reaction temperature also resulted in higher electrocatalytic activities for all the catalysts tested. While the kinetics of the electrochemical reactions can be improved by increasing the temperature [34], the protonic membrane prevented us from testing the system above 90 • C since its stability and conductivity under appropriate humidity conditions is not ensured at these conditions. were normalized by the amount of Cu deposited on each cathodic-catalyst.…”
Section: Co 2 Conversion Electrocatalytic Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%