2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.07.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrochemical removal of phenol from oil refinery wastewater

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
180
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 338 publications
(187 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
5
180
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Owing to the toxic nature of phenol, it is placed under priority list of pollutants that need to be treated before releasing the wastewater to the aquatic ecosystems. The total phenol in refinery wastewater has been estimated to be 13-88 mg/l (Abdelwahab et al 2009;Jou and Huang 2003;Ojumu et al 2005;El Naas et al 2010). Conventional phenol removal techniques include solvent extraction, adsorption, coagulation and chemical oxidation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Owing to the toxic nature of phenol, it is placed under priority list of pollutants that need to be treated before releasing the wastewater to the aquatic ecosystems. The total phenol in refinery wastewater has been estimated to be 13-88 mg/l (Abdelwahab et al 2009;Jou and Huang 2003;Ojumu et al 2005;El Naas et al 2010). Conventional phenol removal techniques include solvent extraction, adsorption, coagulation and chemical oxidation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These are generated during the electrolysis process by electrodissolution of a sacrificial anode made of aluminium or iron. Electrocoagulation has been successfully performed for treatment and remediation of textile wastewaters [18,19], oil wastes [20,21], diary effluents [22], diesel and biodiesel wastewaters [23,24], laundry wastewaters [25], slaughter house effluents [26], arsenic or fluoride containing waters [27,28] and heavy metal bearing effluents [29][30][31][32][33][34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The energy consumption (EC) for the removal of 10 3 g of COD was determined through equation 2: 14,29 (2) where, t is the electrolysis time (h), U is the cell applied potential (V), I is the current (A), V the solution volume (L) and DCOD the COD difference (mg L -1 ).…”
Section: M(ohmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 The electrolytic process has shown to be an efficient low cost, an alternative to the treatment of several aqueous effluents containing organic and inorganic pollutants. 3,4,6,[10][11][12][13][14][15] In this process, different electrode materials, such as Ti/RuO 2 , Ti/IrO 2 , Pt, Ti/PbO 2 , borondoped diamond (BDD) and Ti/SnO 2 -Sb have been tested. Some authors [16][17][18] reported that the "active" electrodes such as Ti/RuO 2 and Ti/IrO 2 are not very effective for phenols degradation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%