2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2020.137663
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrochemical study and XPS analysis of chalcopyrite dissolution in sulfuric acid in the presence of ethylene glycol

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonused Ru/C, Ru/C recovered after J&K, and Sigma HMF conversion were analyzed (see Figure S5 in the Supporting Information). XPS analysis qualitatively confirmed the presence of sulfur as sulfate or sulfonate groups (with a sulfur 2p 3/2 peak at the binding energy of 168.4 eV)) in both catalysts recovered after the reaction. They could be assigned to sulfates or sulfonates formed from DMSO thermal decomposition during the reaction .…”
mentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nonused Ru/C, Ru/C recovered after J&K, and Sigma HMF conversion were analyzed (see Figure S5 in the Supporting Information). XPS analysis qualitatively confirmed the presence of sulfur as sulfate or sulfonate groups (with a sulfur 2p 3/2 peak at the binding energy of 168.4 eV)) in both catalysts recovered after the reaction. They could be assigned to sulfates or sulfonates formed from DMSO thermal decomposition during the reaction .…”
mentioning
confidence: 71%
“…They could be assigned to sulfates or sulfonates formed from DMSO thermal decomposition during the reaction. 28 Samples recovered after Sigma HMF conversion also had a sulfur 2p 3/2 at the binding energy of 162.6 eV that can be assigned to disulfide or thiol groups, 26,29,30 which may have formed from DMSO under the reductive reaction medium. 31 This value is close to the characteristic bond of the bulk RuS2 with pyrite structure (162.5 eV), 32 which points to the poisoning nature of the sulfur−ruthenium interaction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A sulfur peak at the binding energy of 162.2 to 162.6 eV that can be assigned to sulfur(−2) species, such as sulfide and thiol groups, was detected in spectra of spent catalysts recovered after reaction with DMSO, BT, and H 2 SO 4 (Figure S12, Supporting Information). These groups may have formed from the added sulfur species under the reductive reaction medium. , For the mentioned Ru/C samples, the sulfur 2p 3/2 peaks at the binding energies of 166.2 and 168.3–168.6 eV were also observed, which were attributed to sulfoxide and sulfones/sulfonate groups, respectively. The latter fits with our previously published data, where oxidized sulfur species (e.g., sulfone, sulfonate) were formed on the Ru catalyst surface after reaction in the presence of DMSO .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Prior studies on XPS analysis of sulfide species on the chalcopyrite surface investigated monosulfide (S 2− ), disulfide (S 2 ) species. 44,45 The presence of polysulfide (S n 2−…”
Section: ■ Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%