2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2016.02.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrochemical study of fenitrothion and bifenox and their simultaneous determination using multiwalled carbon nanotube modified glassy carbon electrode

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The comparative results are shown in Table ST1. The Table STI clearly revealed that the fabricated sensor electrode has superior analytical performances in terms 11 of low LOD (8 nM) and wider linear response ranges (up to 1133.8 mM) than recently reported peptidenanotubes [32], cerium(IV) oxide/RGO [33], ruthenium phthalocyanine-silica/multi-walled carbon nanotubes [34], pretreated glassy carbon electrode [35], multiwalled carbon nanotubes [36] and TiO2/nafion [37] based FNTN sensors. We have only made the comparison of the sensor with recently published reports since these electrode materials have shown superior electroanalytical performance towards FNTN than their formerly published literature.…”
Section: Analytical Merits Of the Sensormentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The comparative results are shown in Table ST1. The Table STI clearly revealed that the fabricated sensor electrode has superior analytical performances in terms 11 of low LOD (8 nM) and wider linear response ranges (up to 1133.8 mM) than recently reported peptidenanotubes [32], cerium(IV) oxide/RGO [33], ruthenium phthalocyanine-silica/multi-walled carbon nanotubes [34], pretreated glassy carbon electrode [35], multiwalled carbon nanotubes [36] and TiO2/nafion [37] based FNTN sensors. We have only made the comparison of the sensor with recently published reports since these electrode materials have shown superior electroanalytical performance towards FNTN than their formerly published literature.…”
Section: Analytical Merits Of the Sensormentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Compared with available polarographic and chromatographic methods, electrochemical methods are widely used for sensitive detection of FNTN due to their simplicity, low-cost and high sensitivity [35]. To date, a vast number of modified electrodes have been used for sensitive and reliable detection of FNTN including graphene-based composites [32][33][34][35][36][37]. However, the fabrication of highly sensitive sensors for precise determination of FNTN, with wide linear range and low detection limit, is of interest regarding environmental safety, food safety, and human health.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As previously reported, cyclic voltammetry behavior of nitrobenzene depends on the potential sweep range. It does not show any oxidation or reduction peak in the potential range of 0.0–0.7 V vs Ag/AgCl. , …”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Despite the advantages of chromatography techniques, they are time‐consuming, complex and expensive. Also, immunoassay and biosensors with high specificity and sensitivity suffer from disadvantages such as being time‐consuming, requiring a labeling process and low chemical stability and high price .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods have some advantages such as simplicity, rapid responses, good sensitivity, and selectivity . Methyl parathion , fenitrothion and bifenox are examples of OPs that were determined successfully with electrochemical sensors. In this work, a new, inexpensive and a simple electrochemical sensor for determination of fenitrothion is proposed using electrochemical polymerization of zincon at a glassy carbon electrode (GCE).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%