1995
DOI: 10.1021/ic00114a042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrochemistry of the Nickel(II) Tris(2-diphenylphosphinoethyl)phosphine Halide Cations and an X-ray Crystallographic Structure of [Ni(.eta.4-P3P')Br][PF6].cntdot.1/2MeCN.cntdot.H2O

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
15
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
5
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar behaviour has been previously observed for Ni complexes. [41][42][43][44][45] For [(HNP 2 )NiOTf]OTf, the CV shows oxidation processes above 1.0 V, similar to those observed for the corresponding bromide salt. These processes could not be assigned due to irreversibility and overlap.…”
Section: Electrochemical Studiessupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Similar behaviour has been previously observed for Ni complexes. [41][42][43][44][45] For [(HNP 2 )NiOTf]OTf, the CV shows oxidation processes above 1.0 V, similar to those observed for the corresponding bromide salt. These processes could not be assigned due to irreversibility and overlap.…”
Section: Electrochemical Studiessupporting
confidence: 63%
“…These angles are approximately 5° less than the ideal 90°, and the corresponding C(1)−Ni−P(eq) bond angles are 3−5° larger than the ideal 90°. This distortion is a result of the small chelate bite of the tetraphosphine ligand, and similar bond angles are observed for [Ni(PP 3 )(Br)](PF 6 ) 2 and [Ni(PP 3 )P(OMe) 3 ](AsF 6 ) 2 . , The Ni−C(1) distance of 1.780(11) Å is within the range observed for other Ni(II) carbonyl complexes (1.73−1.83 Å), and it is shorter than the Ni−C bond distances observed for the Ni(I) complexes [Ni(NS 3 t -Bu)(CO)] + (1.85(1) Å) and [Ni(NP 3 )(CO)] + (1.90(5) Å), respectively (where NS 3 t -Bu is N(CH 2 CH 2 S t -Bu) 3 and NP 3 is N(CH 2 CH 2 Ph 2 ) 3 ). , These results are consistent with a significant lengthening of the Ni−C bond upon reduction from Ni(II) to Ni(I), but more definitive evidence would be provided by structures of a single complex in both Ni(I) and Ni(II) oxidation states.
1 ORTEP showing the atom-numbering scheme for one of the [Ni(PP 3 E)(CO)] 2+ cations.
…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The identical 31 P NMR spectra of Ni(Cl) L1 H BF 4 ( 1b ) and [Ni(Cl) L1 H ] 2 [NiCl 4 ] ( 1a ) show one doublet ( δ = 61.06 ppm) and one quartet ( δ = 25.91 ppm), indicating a C 3 ‐symmetrical trigonal bipyramidal geometry in solution (on the NMR time scale). C 3 ‐symmetrical diamagnetic complexes of tripodal tetradentate phosphines coordinated to nickel have been previously reported,, , and trigonal bipyramidal geometry was also reported for the d 8 [Ru(N 2 ) L1 H ] and the [Pd(Cl) L1 H ][Cl] complexes. Interestingly, whereas the coordination of nickel to L1 H results in the formation of the binary [Ni(Cl) L1 H ] 2 [NiCl 4 ] complex 2a , the palladium complex does not form the tetrachlorido palladate, but one of the chloride anions remains non‐coordinating .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Similar as for the cobalt analogue, the CV of 2b shows one reversible reduction‐oxidation peak at E 0 1/2 = –1.0 V vs. Fc/Fc + V. In addition, two non‐reversible reduction peaks were observed ( E = –2.0 V vs. Fc/Fc + and E = –2.5 V vs. Fc/Fc + ). CV measurements of [Ni(PP Ph 3 )(CH 3 CN)](BF 4 ) 2 showed only one reversible redox couple ( E 0 1/2 = –1.03 V vs. Fc/Fc + ; likely the Ni II /Ni I couple) and one non‐reversible reduction peak, ( E 0 1/2 = –1.28 V vs. Fc/Fc + ; likely the Ni I /Ni 0 couple) , . The chemical reduction of our [Ni L1 H ]BF 4 ( 2b ) complex with two equivalents of KC 8 resulted in formation of a yellow precipitate.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%