2020
DOI: 10.1109/tbme.2019.2941851
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrocolonography: Non-Invasive Detection of Colonic Cyclic Motor Activity From Multielectrode Body Surface Recordings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
44
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
2
44
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Still, it is important to bear in mind that electrodes at lower locations might be more likely to record not only from the stomach, but also from other organs of the GI tract (Amaris et al., 2002; Erickson et al., 2019). While the rhythmic activity of the small intestine is at higher frequencies, the frequency range of the colon is broader, covering the frequency range between 0.03 and 0.13 Hz (Amaris et al., 2002; Erickson et al., 2019; Homma et al., 1995; Pezzolla et al., 1989; Riezzo et al., 1998), or even up to 0.2 Hz (Taylor et al., 1975). The frequency range of the colon and of the stomach might thus overlap, but the spectral signature of the stomach seems more narrow‐band than the spectral signature of the colon.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Still, it is important to bear in mind that electrodes at lower locations might be more likely to record not only from the stomach, but also from other organs of the GI tract (Amaris et al., 2002; Erickson et al., 2019). While the rhythmic activity of the small intestine is at higher frequencies, the frequency range of the colon is broader, covering the frequency range between 0.03 and 0.13 Hz (Amaris et al., 2002; Erickson et al., 2019; Homma et al., 1995; Pezzolla et al., 1989; Riezzo et al., 1998), or even up to 0.2 Hz (Taylor et al., 1975). The frequency range of the colon and of the stomach might thus overlap, but the spectral signature of the stomach seems more narrow‐band than the spectral signature of the colon.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The small intestine displays frequencies that are much higher than the stomach, usually above 0.16 Hz (Christensen, Schedl, & Clifton, 1966;Riezzo et al, 2013;Waldhausen, Shaffrey, Skenderis, Jones, & Schirmer, 1990). The frequency range of the colon is broader, ranging from 2 to 12 cycles per minute in humans (Erickson et al, 2019;Homma et al, 1995;Pezzolla, Riezzo, Maselli, & Giorgio, 1989;Riezzo, Pezzolla, Maselli, & Giorgio, 1994;Taylor, Duthie, Smallwood, & Linkens, 1975), that is, potentially overlapping in frequency with the gastric rhythm (Amaris, Sanmiguel, Sadowski, Bowes, & Mintchev, 2002;Erickson et al, 2019). Still, numerous studies found that the 3 cpm rhythm disappeared, or was largely reduced, following surgical removal of the stomach but not of the colon (Homma et al, 1995;Imai & Sakita, 2005;Kaiho et al, 2000;Pezzolla et al, 1989).…”
Section: Relating Cutaneous Egg To Gastric Physiologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As EColG is a novel technique, there are limited published data to date; however, it has been specifically validated to detect cyclic motor activity and methods are progressing. Early evidence shows that the same 2-4 cycle per minute CMPs can be detected using EColG, including the increased post-prandial activity (Erickson et al, 2020). If validated in post-operative patients, EColG could be applied to achieve clinicopathological correlation of the hyperactive CMP, including detailed comparisons of right vs. left colectomy.…”
Section: Testing the Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, these concepts have recently been successfully extended to the colorectum by Erickson et al, opening broader applications for HR mapping at the body surface both in gastroenterology and GI surgery. 91 6.1 | Next steps and future directions…”
Section: For Technical Details)mentioning
confidence: 99%