1993
DOI: 10.1021/ac00068a027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electroconcentration by using countercurrent due to pressurized flow and electrophoretic mobility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first report of this approach was in 1990 by Tsuda and Muramatsu [110] for electrochromatography, and was subsequently followed in 1993 by Hori et al [111] who introduced the term 'countercurrent electroconcentration' to describe this approach. Analytes were concentrated at the edge of the electric field, essentially a very sharp step gradient, with a 50-fold increase in sensitivity obtained.…”
Section: Countercurrent Electroconcentrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first report of this approach was in 1990 by Tsuda and Muramatsu [110] for electrochromatography, and was subsequently followed in 1993 by Hori et al [111] who introduced the term 'countercurrent electroconcentration' to describe this approach. Analytes were concentrated at the edge of the electric field, essentially a very sharp step gradient, with a 50-fold increase in sensitivity obtained.…”
Section: Countercurrent Electroconcentrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As long as electric field is being applied, the analyte will continue to be excluded and concentrate. A method with similar principles was published by Hori et al, but the technique employed large volumes and a 1.5 mm diameter tube [36]. Initial work by Polson et al utilized this electrophoretic exclusion technique and demonstrated the ability to exclude and concentrate 200 nm particles at the entrance of a 20 mm i.d.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An early study by Hori et al [14] showed the connection of a large diameter tube (1.5 mm) between two reservoirs containing several milliliters of solution, where the flow was set to oppose the electrophoretic migration of selected species. The electrophoretic migration was larger than the flow rate, which prevented the charged species from being transferred from the reservoir thus concentrating those materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%