Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society 1992
DOI: 10.1109/iembs.1992.5760887
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrode contact noise in surface biopotential measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By placing a surface electrode in contact with the skin through an electrolyte, a distribution of charges occurs at the electrode-electrolyte interface, which results in the appearance of a potential called half-cell potential. If the electrode moves with respect to the electrolyte, there will be an alteration in the distribution of the charge, which will cause a transient variation in the half-cell potential [25,26]. In the same way, at the electrolyte-skin interface, there will also be a distribution of charges and, therefore, an equilibrium potential that will vary if there is movement between the skin and the electrolyte.…”
Section: Electrode Contact Noisementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By placing a surface electrode in contact with the skin through an electrolyte, a distribution of charges occurs at the electrode-electrolyte interface, which results in the appearance of a potential called half-cell potential. If the electrode moves with respect to the electrolyte, there will be an alteration in the distribution of the charge, which will cause a transient variation in the half-cell potential [25,26]. In the same way, at the electrolyte-skin interface, there will also be a distribution of charges and, therefore, an equilibrium potential that will vary if there is movement between the skin and the electrolyte.…”
Section: Electrode Contact Noisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Disturbances caused by muscular actions, such as chewing, the opening or closing of the eyes, frowning, etc., considerably affectthe EOG signal recording [24][25][26][27][28]. The most important muscular action is blinking since it is involuntary, and although it does not modify the electrostatic potential of the eye, it can move the electrodes, creating electrode-skin interference.…”
Section: Noise From Other Biopotentialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fewer works are available on EGS noise and its power spectrum. Although EGS noise has been experimentally observed since the 1950s [1][2][3][4], as well as measured and occasionally modelled in the biosignal frequency range from about 0.1 Hz to 500-1000 Hz [5][6][7], a description of its generation mechanism is still lacking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The skin-electrode interface noise performance is a crucial factor in high-resolution surface bio-potential measurements. Recorded electrocardiogram (ECG) signals have very low amplitudes of 50 μV-10 mV in the bandwidth of 0.5-250 Hz and are highly susceptible to contamination from unwanted interference and noise [1][2][3]. The use of un-gelled or dry electrodes in the ambulatory recording of heart rate and ECG has emerged in recent years and continues to gain popularity [4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This claim is not always supported with experimental evidence. The origin of the noise in surface electrodes has been investigated in the past by several researchers [1,[15][16][17][18][19]. However, there is little or no information available on the noise performance of un-gelled, fabric-based electrodes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%