Aspects on Fundaments and Applications of Conducting Polymers 2012
DOI: 10.5772/27230
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrodeposition of Polypyrrole Films: Influence of Fe3O4 Nanoparticles and Platinum Co-Deposition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This confers on the process the advantages of close control of the deposition voltage, bath simplicity and avoiding the use of contaminating additives. However, in the potentiostatic mode, deposition current is not constant; it tends to decrease as the concentration of the ionic species decrease in the solution [8]. This makes deposition rate control difficult.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This confers on the process the advantages of close control of the deposition voltage, bath simplicity and avoiding the use of contaminating additives. However, in the potentiostatic mode, deposition current is not constant; it tends to decrease as the concentration of the ionic species decrease in the solution [8]. This makes deposition rate control difficult.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This confers on the process the advantages of close control of the deposition voltage and bath simplicity, also avoiding the use of contaminating additives. However, in the potentiostatic mode, the deposition current is not constant; it tends to decrease as the concentration of the ionic species decreases in the solution [8]; this makes deposition rate control difficult. Often, co-deposition involves the use of multi-species ionic baths or solidparticulates in an ionic suspension [9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%