2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ebr.2022.100566
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrodiagnostic artifacts due to neurostimulation devices for drug resistant epilepsy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Luckily, we found one manufacturer, Cochlear Ltd., that still offers the option to select this old-fashioned stimulation mode. After some minor modifications in the setup (higher rejection levels and higher number of averages), the electrophysiological measurements of the auditory pathway objectively confirmed hearing in this patient (EABR and EALR), though strong interferences caused by the trigeminal nerve stimulator made this routine measurement challenging (compare [29]. As these interferences partly appeared continuous and partly a suddenly large stimulation, only a patient-specific setup can help in modifying the rejection threshold to a higher (but as low as possible) value-and in addition set the averages per waveform to the maximum level and/or average multiple averaged waveforms or raw data after the EABR/EALR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Luckily, we found one manufacturer, Cochlear Ltd., that still offers the option to select this old-fashioned stimulation mode. After some minor modifications in the setup (higher rejection levels and higher number of averages), the electrophysiological measurements of the auditory pathway objectively confirmed hearing in this patient (EABR and EALR), though strong interferences caused by the trigeminal nerve stimulator made this routine measurement challenging (compare [29]. As these interferences partly appeared continuous and partly a suddenly large stimulation, only a patient-specific setup can help in modifying the rejection threshold to a higher (but as low as possible) value-and in addition set the averages per waveform to the maximum level and/or average multiple averaged waveforms or raw data after the EABR/EALR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…These include muscle, eye, and respiratory activities, each exhibiting distinct characteristics. Identifying and mitigating these artifacts are crucial for accurate interpretation in epilepsy studies, necessitating meticulous monitoring and advanced signal processing techniques (2) . While EEG offers advantages like portability, affordability, and high temporal resolution, challenges such as spatial resolution limitations and signal-to-noise ratio constraints exist.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%