Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
The ability for hypnotic responding is marked by great inter-individual variation in the population, while the neural underpinning of this variability remains elusive. The current work leveraged multivariate statistics and machine learning to probe the neural dynamics underlying inter-individual differences in hypnotic susceptibility. We assessed the efficacy of linear classifiers in distinguishing between high and low hypnotic susceptible individuals using neural features from resting-state electroencephalography (EEG) both pre- and post-hypnotic induction. Our focus encompassed both aperiodic and periodic components of the power spectrum, and graph theoretical measures derived from functional connectivity patterns. Several neural features from both pre- and post-induction significantly differentiated susceptibility levels, which underscores the complex dynamics of hypnotic phenomena. Based on model comparisons and feature ranking, we discerned the pre-induction aperiodic exponent as the primary discriminating neural feature, while periodic activity did not differ between groups. This novel finding not only resonates with the increasing emphasis on this neural component in broader EEG research but also promotes the idea that the primary neural distinction in hypnotic susceptibility is evident at baseline, even before hypnosis. Based on prevailing interpretation of aperiodicity in the EEG signal, our findings support the idea that hypnotic susceptibility might be an inherent trait reflected in the balance of cortical excitation and inhibition.Significance StatementHypnotic phenomena reflect the ability to alter one’s subjective experiences based on targeted verbal suggestions. While research has made strides in understanding the cognitive aspects underlying the variability in one’s susceptibility to hypnosis, the brain correlates remain largely elusive. Addressing this gap, our study employs multivariate pattern classification and machine learning to predict hypnotic susceptibility. By recording electroencephalography (EEG) before and after hypnotic induction and analyzing diverse neurophysiological features, we identify several features that differentiate between high and low hypnotic susceptible individuals for both pre- and post-induction periods, which underscores the multifaceted nature of hypnotic phenomena. Our analysis revealed that the paramount discriminative feature is arrhythmic (i.e., non-oscillatory) EEG activity prior to the induction—a novel discovery in the field. This finding, that the chief EEG marker is observed even before hypnosis, aligns with the idea that hypnotic susceptibility represents an inherent trait reflecting the balance between excitation and inhibition in neural activity.
The ability for hypnotic responding is marked by great inter-individual variation in the population, while the neural underpinning of this variability remains elusive. The current work leveraged multivariate statistics and machine learning to probe the neural dynamics underlying inter-individual differences in hypnotic susceptibility. We assessed the efficacy of linear classifiers in distinguishing between high and low hypnotic susceptible individuals using neural features from resting-state electroencephalography (EEG) both pre- and post-hypnotic induction. Our focus encompassed both aperiodic and periodic components of the power spectrum, and graph theoretical measures derived from functional connectivity patterns. Several neural features from both pre- and post-induction significantly differentiated susceptibility levels, which underscores the complex dynamics of hypnotic phenomena. Based on model comparisons and feature ranking, we discerned the pre-induction aperiodic exponent as the primary discriminating neural feature, while periodic activity did not differ between groups. This novel finding not only resonates with the increasing emphasis on this neural component in broader EEG research but also promotes the idea that the primary neural distinction in hypnotic susceptibility is evident at baseline, even before hypnosis. Based on prevailing interpretation of aperiodicity in the EEG signal, our findings support the idea that hypnotic susceptibility might be an inherent trait reflected in the balance of cortical excitation and inhibition.Significance StatementHypnotic phenomena reflect the ability to alter one’s subjective experiences based on targeted verbal suggestions. While research has made strides in understanding the cognitive aspects underlying the variability in one’s susceptibility to hypnosis, the brain correlates remain largely elusive. Addressing this gap, our study employs multivariate pattern classification and machine learning to predict hypnotic susceptibility. By recording electroencephalography (EEG) before and after hypnotic induction and analyzing diverse neurophysiological features, we identify several features that differentiate between high and low hypnotic susceptible individuals for both pre- and post-induction periods, which underscores the multifaceted nature of hypnotic phenomena. Our analysis revealed that the paramount discriminative feature is arrhythmic (i.e., non-oscillatory) EEG activity prior to the induction—a novel discovery in the field. This finding, that the chief EEG marker is observed even before hypnosis, aligns with the idea that hypnotic susceptibility represents an inherent trait reflecting the balance between excitation and inhibition in neural activity.
State anxiety involves transient feelings of tension and nervousness in response to threats, which can escalate into anxiety disorders if persistent. Despite treatments, 30%-50% of individuals show limited improvement, and neurophysiological mechanisms of treatment responsiveness remain unclear, requiring the development of objective biomarkers. In this study, we monitored multimodal electrophysiological parameters: heart rate variability (high-frequency, low-frequency, LF/HF ratio), EEG beta and alpha relative power, and brain-to-heart connectivity in participants with real-life state anxiety. Participants underwent a therapeutic intervention combining virtual-reality immersion, hypnotic script, and a breath control exercise. Real-life state anxiety was captured using the STAI-Y1 scale before and after the intervention. We observed reduced anxiety immediately after the intervention in 16 out of 27 participants. While all participants, independently of their STAI-Y1 score, showed increased HRV low frequency power, only treatment-responders displayed increased overall autonomic tone (high and low frequency HRV), increased midline beta power and brain-to-heart connectivity. Notably, the LF/HF ratio showed a significant linear relationship with anxiety reduction, with higher ratios linked to greater therapeutic response. These findings suggest that increased cognitive regulation of brain-to-heart connectivity could serve as a biomarker for therapeutic efficacy, with elevated midline beta power facilitating improved cardiac tone in responders.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.