We have studied the effects of midazolam premedication on multiple anaesthetic end-points (hypnotic, loss of verbal contact (LVC); motor, dropping an infusion flex or bag (DF); analgesic, loss of reaction to painful stimulation (LRP); and EEG, attainment of burst suppression (BUR)) during induction by slow thiopental infusion at a rate of 55 mg kg-1 h-1. Patients received midazolam 0.05 mg kg-1 i.v. (group TM, n12) or no midazolam (group T0, n13). ED 50 and ED 95 values and group medians for times and doses at the end-points were measured. Midazolam premedication reduced significantly thiopental ED 50 and ED 95 values at all end-points (exception for ED 95 for BUR). Potentiation was greatest for the motor end-point (dropping the infusion bag (DF)) (ED 95 52%, ED 50 23%, median 39%), and smallest for painful stimulation (LRP) (median 18%; ED 50 13%). For LRP and DF, premedication was associated with significant, non-parallel increases in the slope of the thiopental dose-response curves, resulting in marked potency ratio changes from ED 50 to ED 95 (LRP 31%, DF 29%). There were no such increases for LVC or BUR. The interaction between midazolam and thiopental varied with the anaesthetic end-point and may also depend on the dose of thiopental. Our data suggest that the mechanism of interaction between midazolam premedication and thiopental was different for motor effects or analgesia (DF, LRP) compared with hypnotic effects or cortical depression (LVC, BUR), in agreement with the different central nervous system substrates underlying these distinct anaesthetic end-points. Br J Anaesth 1999; 83: 590-5 The use of drug combinations is popular in clinical anaesthetic practice. Combinations can increase the spectrum of action of anaesthesia and reduce side effects by decreasing the required dose of individual drugs by synergism or additive effects. As anaesthesia results from the summation of multiple central nervous system effects, investigations of anaesthetic drug interactions should ideally include multiple end-points relevant to the anaesthetic state. The majority of studies defining drug interactions for anaesthesia have involved i.v. bolus administration. Typically , they provide dose-effect relationships for a single clinical end-point, such as the hypnotic end-point of loss of verbal contact or the eyelash reflex, examined in a fixed time window. Such studies do not generally provide © British Journal of Anaesthesia information on clinically important time elements or allow comparison of interactions at multiple end-points. Infusion induction titration models 1 2 may represent an interesting alternative for the study of drug interactions. They include the clinically important time element, allow easy evaluation and comparison of multiple end-points in one patient and session, and provide clinically relevant results applicable to bolus dosing. 2 Midazolam, as an i.v. premedicant or co-inductant, has been shown to result in hypnotic synergism with thiopental 3 4 during induction of anaesthesia using bolus methodo...