Electroencephalography of response inhibition tasks: Functional networks and cognitive contributions

Huster, René J.; Enriquez‐Geppert, Stefanie; Lavallee, Christina F.; Falkenstein, Michael; Herrmann, Christoph S.

doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2012.08.001

Cited by 594 publications

(781 citation statements)

References 135 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

689

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…P3 latency is thought to reflect the speed of the classification process (Kutas, McCarthy, Donchin, 1977;Magliero, Bashore, Coles, & Donchin, 1984). The P3 has also been linked to response inhibition because P3 amplitudes are typically larger for successful versus failed stop trials in healthy adults (Bekker, Kenemans et al, 2005;Dimoska, Johnstone, Barry, & Clarke, 2003;Greenhouse & Wessel, 2013;Kok, Ramautar, De Ruiter, Band, & Ridderinkhof, 2004;Lansbergen, Bocker, Bekker, & Kenemans, 2007;Senderecka, Grabowska, Szewczyk, Gerc, & Chmylak, 2012) and larger for nogo than go trials (see Huster, Enriquez-Geppert, Lavallee, Falkenstein & Herrmann, 2013 for review).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…To test for differences between no-signal and signal trials, we focused on the N2 and P3 components because previous go/nogo and stop-signal ERP studies have linked these components with signal-or conflict detection, conflict resolution, response selection, and/or inhibition on signal trials (for review see Huster et al, 2013). For statistical analysis of the N2, we averaged amplitudes in electrodes Fz, FCz and Cz; for the analysis of the P3, we averaged amplitudes in electrodes FCz, Cz and Pz 4 .…”

Section: Eeg/erps the Electroencephalogram (Eeg) Was Acquired Using 64mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

How to withhold or replace a prepotent response: An analysis of the underlying control processes and their temporal dynamics

Elchlepp

Verbruggen

2017

Biological Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Eeg/erps the Electroencephalogram (Eeg) Was Acquired Using 64mentioning

confidence: 99%

How to withhold or replace a prepotent response: An analysis of the underlying control processes and their temporal dynamics

Elchlepp

Verbruggen

2017

Biological Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Some of the most important inhibitory processes occur within the first second after the presentation of the stimuli or information that must be inhibited (Kok 1999;Amieva et al 2004;Huster et al 2013). To study inhibitory processes in the narrow time window when they occur, event-related brain potentials (ERPs) have been used.…”

Section: Measuring the Time Course Of Inhibitionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In early research, these two components were often referred to together as the "N2-P3 complex" Huster et al 2013). …”

Section: Erps For Inhibition Between 200 and 400 Msmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…To the best of our knowledge, no studies have included source localization analyses of semantic inhibition ERP correlates. Recent studies have adopted a multimodal approach, which has coupled EEG and fMRI recordings to study brain generators of inhibition triggered during a Stop-signal task (Huster et al 2013) and combined Eriksen…”

Section: Brain Structure Activation During Inhibition: Evidence From mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Event-Related Brain Potentials in the Study of Inhibition: Cognitive Control, Source Localization and Age-Related Modulations

et al. 2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the previous fifteen years, a variety of experimental paradigms and methods have been employed to study inhibition. In the current review, we analyze studies that have used the high temporal resolution of the event-related potential (ERP) technique to identify the temporal course of inhibition to understand the various processes that contribute to inhibition. ERP studies with a focus on normal aging are specifically analyzed because they contribute to a deeper understanding of inhibition. Three time windows are proposed to organize the ERP data collected using inhibition paradigms: the 200 ms period following stimulus onset; the period between 200 and 400 ms after stimulus onset; and the period between 400 and 800 ms after stimulus onset. In the first 200 ms, ERP inhibition research has primarily focused on N1 and P1 as the ERP components associated with inhibition. The inhibitory processing in the second time window has been associated with the N2 and P3 ERP components. Finally, in the third time window, inhibition has primarily been associated with the N400 and N450 ERP components. Source localization studies are analyzed to examine 2 the association between the inhibition processes that are indexed by the ERP components and their functional brain areas. Inhibition can be organized in a complex functional structure that is not constrained to a specific time point but, rather, extends its activity through different time windows. This review characterizes inhibition as a set of processes rather than a unitary process.

show abstract

Aggressiveness, inhibitory control, and emotional states: A provocation paradigm

Sebalo,

Bozzay,

Verona

et al. 2024

Aggressive Behavior

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The current study examines the effects of trait aggressiveness, inhibitory control and emotional states on aggressive behavior in a laboratory paradigm. One hundred and fifty‐one adult participants took part (73 men, 71 women, and 7 nondisclosed). Event Related Potentials (ERPs) during a Go/No‐Go task were utilized to capture the extent of inhibitory processing, with a laboratory provocation paradigm used to assess aggression. Contrary to the expectations, negative affective responses to provocation were negatively associated only with short‐lived aggression and only among those with high past aggressiveness. Furthermore, past aggressiveness was related to a continuous increase in laboratory aggressive behavior regardless of the level of inhibitory control (P3 difference amplitude). However, feeling hostile was associated with short‐lived aggressive behavior, only in those with lower levels of inhibitory control. These findings demonstrate the effect of distinct mechanisms on different patterns of aggressive behavior.

show abstract

Electroencephalography of response inhibition tasks: Functional networks and cognitive contributions

Cited by 594 publications

References 135 publications

How to withhold or replace a prepotent response: An analysis of the underlying control processes and their temporal dynamics

How to withhold or replace a prepotent response: An analysis of the underlying control processes and their temporal dynamics

Event-Related Brain Potentials in the Study of Inhibition: Cognitive Control, Source Localization and Age-Related Modulations

Aggressiveness, inhibitory control, and emotional states: A provocation paradigm

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About