1931
DOI: 10.2115/fiber1925.7.29
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrokinetic Potential on Cellulose

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1946
1946
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the plots of the conversion versus time curves obtained at 0.48 M initial monomer concentration shown in Figures 19 and 20, the plot of the conversion versus molecular weight curve obtained at 0.48 M initial monomer concentration shown in Figure 23 and the log–log plot of M w versus initial monomer concentration shown in Figure 24, three phenomena were observed: (1) a rapid increase in the molecular weight at low monomer % conversion followed by a slight increase in molecular weight during the “constant‐rate” period (interval II), (2) a slight gel effect between 66–70.5% conversion and polymer degradation after 70.5% conversion in the case of an emulsion containing 0.48 M initial monomer concentration, and (3) the weight average molecular weight increased with increasing initial monomer concentration (i.e., M w α[Monomer] 0.18 ), to a point, then became independent of initial monomer concentration. The gel effect phenomenon was observed by Zimmt,49 Trommsdorff and colleagues,63 and Kanamaru and Terasoki64 in their works on the emulsion polymerization of MMA. It was attributed to the reduction in termination rates as the viscosity of the medium increased at higher % conversion.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From the plots of the conversion versus time curves obtained at 0.48 M initial monomer concentration shown in Figures 19 and 20, the plot of the conversion versus molecular weight curve obtained at 0.48 M initial monomer concentration shown in Figure 23 and the log–log plot of M w versus initial monomer concentration shown in Figure 24, three phenomena were observed: (1) a rapid increase in the molecular weight at low monomer % conversion followed by a slight increase in molecular weight during the “constant‐rate” period (interval II), (2) a slight gel effect between 66–70.5% conversion and polymer degradation after 70.5% conversion in the case of an emulsion containing 0.48 M initial monomer concentration, and (3) the weight average molecular weight increased with increasing initial monomer concentration (i.e., M w α[Monomer] 0.18 ), to a point, then became independent of initial monomer concentration. The gel effect phenomenon was observed by Zimmt,49 Trommsdorff and colleagues,63 and Kanamaru and Terasoki64 in their works on the emulsion polymerization of MMA. It was attributed to the reduction in termination rates as the viscosity of the medium increased at higher % conversion.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Trommsdorff and colleagues63 studied the emulsion polymerization by using turkey red oil as the surfactant and potassium persulfate as the initiator, and found that the polymerization rate was not influenced significantly by variation of the surfactant concentration in the range of 0.125–4%. Kanamara and Terasoki64 studied the emulsion polymerization of MMA at 70°C by using sodium lauryl sulfate as the surfactant and ammonium persulfate as the initiator. They found that the values of degree of polymerization (DP) varied, not to the −0.6 power of the initiator concentration predicted by the Smith–Ewart Case II Kinetics, but to the −0.46 to −0.3 power.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A summation of such tests has been compiled by Heermann [42] and by Tatu [104]. If we omit such tests as solubility in calcium thiocyanate [68], heats of combustion [ 11 ] , refractivity [64], electrokinetic properties [65,91], Nessler's reagent [24,26,38], specialized dying tests [29,32,39,40,62,75,82,99] , ferricyanide test [28], or microscopic examination [33,41,94] which are of recent introduction (and hence incompletely evaluated or designed for special industrial control) it is evident that the bulk of the alleged &dquo;knowledge&dquo; of the structure of oxidized celluloses rests on the results of methylene-blue absorption, cuprammonium hydroxide viscosity (fluidity), and copper number determinations. The interpretation of these tests was evolved from an examination of oxidized celluloses of variable and unknown chemical structures; then the results of such tests were applied to determining the structure of oxidized celluloses !…”
Section: C0evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%