2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2005.06.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrokinetic properties of natural fibres

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
46
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
3
46
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…These strong polar groups bond water, induce swelling and are generally responsible for the hydrophilic behaviour of the fibre surface. As it has been previously reported (Bellmann et al 2005), increasing pH produces more negative value of cotton zeta potential, the fact which confirms increased cotton fibre polarity and explains the behaviour of untreated cotton (increased WRC) in alkaline environment.…”
Section: Drying Curves and Moisture Regainsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…These strong polar groups bond water, induce swelling and are generally responsible for the hydrophilic behaviour of the fibre surface. As it has been previously reported (Bellmann et al 2005), increasing pH produces more negative value of cotton zeta potential, the fact which confirms increased cotton fibre polarity and explains the behaviour of untreated cotton (increased WRC) in alkaline environment.…”
Section: Drying Curves and Moisture Regainsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…The surface modification procedures applied to natural fibres include hydrophobisation of the fibre surface using coupling agents such as silanes [35,36], which should lead to improved adhesion to non-polar polymer matricies [37]. Other treatments include alkalisation, acetylation and cyanoethylation, which cannot only improve the fibre's adhesion to the matrix, but also aid polymer diffusion into the fibre bulk, providing the adhesion with a physical dimension [38,39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14). We verified the accuracy of our derivation of G and numerical solutions by comparing the values we calculate for z against the data of z versus I c for sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) pectin (Nakauma et al, 2008; G ¼ G high ) and for cellulose (Bellmann et al, 2005; G ¼ G low ). We find good agreement between our predictions and the experimental data.…”
Section: Determination Of G From Experimental Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%