2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2022.120972
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrolytic extraction of yttrium using recycle liquid gallium electrode from molten LiCl-KCl

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar investigation was carried out by Wang et al for Y recovery from spent fuel from molten LiCl–KCl, this time using a liquid Ga electrode. 166 Similar analyses were performed as the previous study by the same authors, with a maximum extraction rate of 99.39% quantified by ICP-AES. Separation of U from Ce, La and Sm in LiCl–KCl systems using porous Al electrodes was investigated by Wang et al 167 Almost no lanthanides were detected in the electrolysis products using ICP-AES, with a rapid and efficient separation and improved kinetic performance using an Al honeycomb electrode with regular pores compared with Al foam electrodes with irregular pores.…”
Section: Inorganic Chemicals and Materialsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…A similar investigation was carried out by Wang et al for Y recovery from spent fuel from molten LiCl–KCl, this time using a liquid Ga electrode. 166 Similar analyses were performed as the previous study by the same authors, with a maximum extraction rate of 99.39% quantified by ICP-AES. Separation of U from Ce, La and Sm in LiCl–KCl systems using porous Al electrodes was investigated by Wang et al 167 Almost no lanthanides were detected in the electrolysis products using ICP-AES, with a rapid and efficient separation and improved kinetic performance using an Al honeycomb electrode with regular pores compared with Al foam electrodes with irregular pores.…”
Section: Inorganic Chemicals and Materialsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Therefore, the reduction behavior on the Mo cathode of Ga(III) ions can be considered as a two-step electron transfer from Ga(III) to Ga(I) and Ga(I) to Ga(0). 29 Figure 1b shows the CV curves at a range of scanning rates in NaCl-2CsCl-GaCl 3 eutectic salt with a scanning interval of −1.0−0 V. As shown in Figure 1c,e, the redox peak potentials of the two reaction processes hardly vary with the natural logarithm of the scan rates, indicating that the reduction of Ga(III)/Ga(I) and Ga(I)/Ga(0) on the Mo cathode are reversible processes in the measured scan rate range (100−200 mV s −1 ). In addition, Figure 1d,f shows that a linear relationship between the peak current (I p ) of the two reactions and the square root of the scanning rate (v 1/2 ) the peak and almost all of them have passed the zero point, inferring that both reaction processes are controlled by diffusion.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among them, the redox peak A′/A can be recognized, which should be corresponded to the deposition and dissolution of alkali metal Na­(I)/Na(0), B′/B may be related to the dissolution/deposition of Ga x Na y alloys, and the redox peaks C 1 ′/C 1 and C 2 ′/C 2 are attributed to the redox reaction of Ga­(III). Therefore, the reduction behavior on the Mo cathode of Ga­(III) ions can be considered as a two-step electron transfer from Ga­(III) to Ga­(I) and Ga­(I) to Ga(0) Figure b shows the CV curves at a range of scanning rates in NaCl-2CsCl-GaCl 3 eutectic salt with a scanning interval of −1.0–0 V. As shown in Figure c,e, the redox peak potentials of the two reaction processes hardly vary with the natural logarithm of the scan rates, indicating that the reduction of Ga­(III)/Ga­(I) and Ga­(I)/Ga(0) on the Mo cathode are reversible processes in the measured scan rate range (100–200 mV s –1 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the Nernst equation, the equilibrium electrode potential can be expressed by the standard electrode potential: ,, where E Sn(II)/Sn(0) eq and E Sn(II)/Sn(0) 0 are the equilibrium and standard electrode potential, respectively, and a Sn(II) and a Sn(0) are the activity coefficients of Sn­(II) and Sn(0), respectively. The standard apparent electrode potential E Sn(II)/Sn(0) *0 can be obtained from the standard electrode potential E Sn(II)/Sn(0) 0 : where ; X Sn(II) is the molar content of Sn­(II) in the melts.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%