2020
DOI: 10.5599/jese.751
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrolytic iron production from alkaline suspensions of solid oxides: compared cases of hematite, iron ore and iron-rich Bayer process residues

Abstract: <p class="PaperAbstract"><span lang="EN-GB">Iron can be produced by the direct electrochemical reduction of hematite particles suspended in hot, concentrated NaOH solutions. Because various other iron sources can be considered, the present work was aimed at investigating the electrolytic treatment of the “red mud” generated by the Bayer process for alumina preparation from bauxite. Such sources contain very high amounts of impurities, in particular silicon and aluminium oxide-based minerals, in add… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering the results of the experiments and the residue characterization, the following mechanism is suggested for high-iron BR leaching in the presence of Fe 2+ ( Figure 12 ). The dissolution of iron-containing minerals is limited by the low solubility of iron in an alkaline solution [ 53 ]. The presence of Fe 2+ promotes the extraction of Al from Al-hematite and Al-goethite via precipitation of magnetite from the solution because a new portion of Fe can be further dissolved.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the results of the experiments and the residue characterization, the following mechanism is suggested for high-iron BR leaching in the presence of Fe 2+ ( Figure 12 ). The dissolution of iron-containing minerals is limited by the low solubility of iron in an alkaline solution [ 53 ]. The presence of Fe 2+ promotes the extraction of Al from Al-hematite and Al-goethite via precipitation of magnetite from the solution because a new portion of Fe can be further dissolved.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[15] The feasibility of the method for lower grades of iron oxide feedstocks such as pseudobrookite (Fe 2 TiO 5 ), [17] titanomagnetite iron sand (Fe 2 + (Fe 3 + , Ti) 2 O 4 ), [18] and red mud (iron-rich waste from the aluminum industry) was also shown. [19,20] Nevertheless, the reported inconsistent range of Faradaic efficiencies in previous studies (5-100 %) [21] lacked differentiation between anode types, experimental environments, and cell configurations. In contrast, we suspected that these process parameters likely influence the overall electrolysis performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…investigated the impacts of the cathode‐anode relative configuration (the type of connection between the cathode and current collector) [15] . The feasibility of the method for lower grades of iron oxide feedstocks such as pseudobrookite (Fe 2 TiO 5 ), [17] titanomagnetite iron sand (Fe 2+ (Fe 3+ , Ti) 2 O 4 ), [18] and red mud (iron‐rich waste from the aluminum industry) was also shown [19,20] …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies on Fe 3 O 4 [9,14] and FeOOH [14] were also performed, showing, however, generally lower efficiencies. Different feedstocks for the electrochemical reduction for steelmaking are now under consideration, including iron-rich waste such as red mud from the aluminium industry [16,17]. The role of some specific elements like Al [18,19] and Mg [20] on the reduction mechanisms of hematite-or magnetite-based compounds were also studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%