2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0890-6955(03)00151-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrolytic magnetic abrasive finishing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
37
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The simulation results for material removal and surface roughness during C-MAF are validated with the experimental results of Yan et al [17]. The machining parameters and material properties employed in the simulation are taken from reference [17] and are given in [17] for comparison.…”
Section: Validation Of C-maf Process Modelmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The simulation results for material removal and surface roughness during C-MAF are validated with the experimental results of Yan et al [17]. The machining parameters and material properties employed in the simulation are taken from reference [17] and are given in [17] for comparison.…”
Section: Validation Of C-maf Process Modelmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The machining parameters and material properties employed in the simulation are taken from reference [17] and are given in [17] for comparison. Fig.…”
Section: Validation Of C-maf Process Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fig. 2 schematically depicts the EMAM setup for better machining and finishing [25]. The parts numbering shows 1-DC power source, 2-brush, 3-electrode, 4-magnetic abrasives, 5-workpiece, 6-magnetic poles, 7-electrolyte reservoir, 8-electrolytic tank, 9-electrolyte 10-filter, 11-pump, 12-Metering Valve, 13-flow gauge.…”
Section: Elk Asia Pacific Journals -Special Issue Isbn: 978-81-930411mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the hybrid process combining both as constituent processes evolved. Yan et al (2003) reported working efficiency of EMAF much higher than MAF matches low electrolytic current density closely to avoid electrolysis and provide permissible condition for accelerating the removal of material and simultaneously obtain superior finished surface [26]. Fang et al (2002) reported magnetic field electrochemistry on removal rate, finishing efficiency for electrochemical machining [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, electrochemical machining is well known due to its short finishing time and high surface finishing capability for metals such as SUS304 [10], [11]. Electrochemical finishing for aluminum causes pits in most cases [12], [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%