2005
DOI: 10.1109/tmag.2005.847637
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electromagnetic applications of a new finite-difference calculus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
95
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
1
95
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We now use the effective parameters displayed in figure 7 to compute the transmission and reflection coefficients for a finite structure consisting of L = 10 layers of elementary cells and to compare T/R for the equivalent homogeneous slab with the exact results, which were obtained by the finite difference method previously referred to as FD-FLAME [24,25,27,28]. In p-polarization, the magnetic field has only one component.…”
Section: (B) Example 2: Dispersive Layered Metal-dielectric Mediummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We now use the effective parameters displayed in figure 7 to compute the transmission and reflection coefficients for a finite structure consisting of L = 10 layers of elementary cells and to compare T/R for the equivalent homogeneous slab with the exact results, which were obtained by the finite difference method previously referred to as FD-FLAME [24,25,27,28]. In p-polarization, the magnetic field has only one component.…”
Section: (B) Example 2: Dispersive Layered Metal-dielectric Mediummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For previous work on the UWVF for Maxwell, we refer to [8,17,19,34]; for different Trefftz-based approaches, we mention [20,47]. Taking cue from the UWVF and following [34], we study a class of Trefftz methods that rely on a DG formulation of the electric field-based Maxwell problem, where the divergence-free constraint is not imposed; the discrete solutions will be elementwise divergence-free, but not globally.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Classical FD methods are easy to understand and simple to implement on digital computers, but they have poor numerical dispersion characteristics [3,4]. Recent advancements in highly accurate 2D FDFD algorithms [5][6][7][8][9] have overcome dispersion problems of the classical methods. Along these lines in 2010 Chang and Mu published work on the method of connected local fields (CLF, [10,11]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%