1973
DOI: 10.1190/1.1440348
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electromagnetic Coupling in Frequency and Time‐domain Induced‐polarization Surveys Over a Multilayered Earth

Abstract: Electromagnetic coupling responses in frequency and time‐domain induced‐polarization measurements over a multilayered earth are evaluated. For collinear dipole‐dipole and pole‐dipole configurations over a dissipative layered subsurface, the percent frequency effects of electromagnetic coupling are seen to be as high as 60 percent for large [Formula: see text] values, where L is the length of the receiving dipole, [Formula: see text] is the conductivity of the top layer of the half‐space, and f is the higher fr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
37
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The duration of the EM effect depends on the electrode separation and the impedance of the subsurface (Zonge et al 2005). Other studies have suggested methods for handling/removing the EM coupling effects (Dey & Morrison 1973;Johnson 1984;Routh & Oldenburg 2001) but this is not within of the scope of this study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The duration of the EM effect depends on the electrode separation and the impedance of the subsurface (Zonge et al 2005). Other studies have suggested methods for handling/removing the EM coupling effects (Dey & Morrison 1973;Johnson 1984;Routh & Oldenburg 2001) but this is not within of the scope of this study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…A number of methods have been suggested (Dey and Morrison, 1973;Wynn and Zonge, 1975;Pelton et al, 1978;Song, 1984;Caglar, 2000;Routh and Oldenburg, 2001); most are complicated to implement, or are not well described. One approach that is relatively simple to implement is suggested by Pelton et al (1978).…”
Section: Sipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Possible sources of noise include random or correlated errors in the equipment, and ambient current sources within the ground, such as telluric currents or self potentials. Electromagnetic inductive or capacitive coupling, both of which scale with frequency, can also give spurious results, but this is considered to be a distortion of the data rather than noise (Wait, 1959;Dey and Morrison, 1973;. Because many of the measurements are made at the millivolt level, it is important to reduce noise levels at the site to a minimum and to filter out any spurious data points in the data set before performing an inversion.…”
Section: Raw Data and Preprocessing Noise And Data Distortionsmentioning
confidence: 99%