2012 IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility 2012
DOI: 10.1109/isemc.2012.6351773
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electromagnetic Environmental Effects (E3) computational analysis of a navy frigate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This approach of identifying and using only critical elements of the ship structure for large electrical size EMI studies using full wave solver techniques (e.g. MLFMM) is not new; it is commonly used [2][3] and has been found not to compromise too much on simulated results accuracy [2]. An alternative method to determine critical ship structure to be included in the simulation is to use asymptotic techniques (e.g.…”
Section: B Ship Structure and Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This approach of identifying and using only critical elements of the ship structure for large electrical size EMI studies using full wave solver techniques (e.g. MLFMM) is not new; it is commonly used [2][3] and has been found not to compromise too much on simulated results accuracy [2]. An alternative method to determine critical ship structure to be included in the simulation is to use asymptotic techniques (e.g.…”
Section: B Ship Structure and Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such studies there is an absence in validating or verifying their simulated results to provide some level of confidence in the accuracy of their simulated results. From the same ship EMI/EMC studies where there has been some attempt to verify the simulated results with different CEM techniques they have been done using the same CEM software tool [2]. So in these studies there is an absence in validating or verifying the simulated results using totally different CEM techniques and CEM software tools.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation