2020
DOI: 10.1109/temc.2020.2970471
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electromagnetic Field Propagation and Indoor Exclusion Zone Analysis in a Nuclear Power Plant

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, we found that the envelope of the received power curve is very similar to the gain curve in the LoS direction according to the altitude h. The envelope of the received power gradually decreases due to the weak radiation pattern of the transmitting antenna in the tail direction of the rocket when the rocket's altitude increases. Figure 10 describes the received power intensity and phase differences between direct and reflected rays, which can be written as Equations ( 2) and (3), respectively [22]:…”
Section: Verification Using Ray Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, we found that the envelope of the received power curve is very similar to the gain curve in the LoS direction according to the altitude h. The envelope of the received power gradually decreases due to the weak radiation pattern of the transmitting antenna in the tail direction of the rocket when the rocket's altitude increases. Figure 10 describes the received power intensity and phase differences between direct and reflected rays, which can be written as Equations ( 2) and (3), respectively [22]:…”
Section: Verification Using Ray Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…( ) Figure 10 describes the received power intensity and phase differences between direct and reflected rays, which can be written as Equations ( 2) and (3), respectively [22]:…”
Section: Verification Using Ray Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 On the other hand, as digital technology has seen more and more use in NPPs, concerns around electromagnetic (EM) interference caused by this digital equipment have arisen. [3][4][5][6] These concerns relate to maintaining the functionality of digital equipment, which is vital for various safety functions in NPPs, and should be guaranteed in any environment including those where electromagnetic coupling is a risk. As such, adequate precautions are required to reduce the risks of EM coupling negatively affecting digital equipment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Digital technology has been applied to nuclear power plants (NPPs) because it offers various advantages when operating and maintaining NPPs 1,2 . On the other hand, as digital technology has seen more and more use in NPPs, concerns around electromagnetic (EM) interference caused by this digital equipment have arisen 3–6 . These concerns relate to maintaining the functionality of digital equipment, which is vital for various safety functions in NPPs, and should be guaranteed in any environment including those where electromagnetic coupling is a risk.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…실제 환경에서 수신되 는 신호는 발사체와 제어동 사이에 가시선(line-of-sight: LoS)을 따라 전달되는 직접 경로(direct path)와 지형이나 건물들에 의해서 한 번 이상 굴절이나 회절이 발생한 뒤 전달되는 간접경로(indirect path)로 구분된다. 여기서, 총 수신전력은 식 (1)과 같이 직접경로로 전달되는 신호와 간접경로로 전달되는 신호의 합으로서 나타낼 수 있다[20],[21]…”
unclassified