2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2009.05.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electromagnetic integral equations requiring small numbers of Krylov-subspace iterations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
80
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
80
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, when k is large, these techniques are limited in terms of stability because the mathematical structure and physics of the underlying operator, that is the Maxwell operators, are lost during the purely algebraic operations. To overcome this problem, recent promising directions [11][12][13]10,9,22,23,2,19,42,21,41] have emerged by producing new preconditioning techniques based on (pseudo differential) operators calculus and integral equations that are then discretized to get a matrix representation. One crucial point in these approaches is to build approximate and accurate representations of the operators linking the magnetic (M) and the electric (J) surface currents through the so-called Magnetic-to-Electric (MtE) map [51]: MtE(M, J) = 0 on Γ , where Γ is the scattering surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, when k is large, these techniques are limited in terms of stability because the mathematical structure and physics of the underlying operator, that is the Maxwell operators, are lost during the purely algebraic operations. To overcome this problem, recent promising directions [11][12][13]10,9,22,23,2,19,42,21,41] have emerged by producing new preconditioning techniques based on (pseudo differential) operators calculus and integral equations that are then discretized to get a matrix representation. One crucial point in these approaches is to build approximate and accurate representations of the operators linking the magnetic (M) and the electric (J) surface currents through the so-called Magnetic-to-Electric (MtE) map [51]: MtE(M, J) = 0 on Γ , where Γ is the scattering surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have explained, in Section 5, how to do this for partial wave expansions, plane waves, and (of course) the potentials induced by known impressed currents and charges. We have also developed integral representations for [15], the Calderon preconditioning combined source integral equation (CP-CSIE) [12], and the regularized combined source integral equation (RCSIE) [7]. the vector and scalar potentials that lead to well-conditioned second kind integral equations (the decoupled potential integral equations or DPIE).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, one usually turns to preconditioned Krylov subspace iterative methods. When such iterative solutions are employed, the efficient and parallel computation of effective preconditioners poses an immense challenge [6,12,[36][37][38][39][40][41][42]. This work proposes a one-level non-overlapping additive Schwarz DD preconditioner [43] for the solution of the DG-BEM linear system equation, Ax = b.…”
Section: Domain Decomposition Solvermentioning
confidence: 99%