2011 IEEE International Electric Machines &Amp; Drives Conference (IEMDC) 2011
DOI: 10.1109/iemdc.2011.5994762
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electromagnetic losses computation in existing large hydro electrical generators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be observed in this case that the flux density magnitude did not exceed 1.2 Tesla for all sensors. Many other core loss models were proposed in the last decade [5][6][7][8][9][10][11] that considered the Steinmetz model as a base for the iron separation method. The recent time-domain dynamic core loss model proposed recently in [6] is used in this case study to compute the magnetic core losses.…”
Section: B Flux Coil Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It can be observed in this case that the flux density magnitude did not exceed 1.2 Tesla for all sensors. Many other core loss models were proposed in the last decade [5][6][7][8][9][10][11] that considered the Steinmetz model as a base for the iron separation method. The recent time-domain dynamic core loss model proposed recently in [6] is used in this case study to compute the magnetic core losses.…”
Section: B Flux Coil Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time-domain dynamic-core loss model proposed in [6] was initially applied to compute instantaneous core losses in small electromagnetic devices in both twodimensional and three-dimensional finite element analysis. The model proposed in [6] was extended [7][8][9][10] to compute the magnetic-core losses and their corresponding spatial distribution in large hydroelectric generators.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%