1995
DOI: 10.1109/77.403254
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electromagnetic nondestructive evaluation with simple HTS SQUIDs: measurements and modelling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For a single flaw such as a narrow rectangular slit and a source such as the 63 mm diameter double-D induction coil described later, the solution takes several hours. Given this onerous overhead, we have limited our FEM studies to the effects of different coil geometries, observed via current flow amplitudes in the specimen, and of different induction frequencies, in the latter case obtaining results which corresponded well with experimental measurements [11].…”
Section: Modelingmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…For a single flaw such as a narrow rectangular slit and a source such as the 63 mm diameter double-D induction coil described later, the solution takes several hours. Given this onerous overhead, we have limited our FEM studies to the effects of different coil geometries, observed via current flow amplitudes in the specimen, and of different induction frequencies, in the latter case obtaining results which corresponded well with experimental measurements [11].…”
Section: Modelingmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…But in FEM based analysis, the number of finite elements for modelling increases remarkably as the size of the flaw becomes narrow and its shape becomes complex, [5], [6]. Therefore, it is difficult to make an accurate finite element model for such flaws and a large amount of computer resources is also necessary to compute the Eddy current distributions [6], [7]. Accordingly the accurate 3D simulation of the whole system as a single problem is not practical.…”
Section: Numerical Finite Element Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent adaptation of coil inducers is the 'double-D' excitation coil. This design is used at Strathclyde [65][66][67] and (a very similar design) KFA [68,69] for high-T c SQUID gradiometric systems. The excitation coil has the same layout as the double-D pick-up coil at the centre of figure 12.…”
Section: The Current Induction Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SQUID response above the surface of a fibreglass-clad aluminium pressure vessel scanned with a high-T c electronic gradiometer and double-D excitation coil (Strathclyde design). This section of the vessel has a fatigue crack in the aluminium which perturbs the field greatly in the vicinity of (150,150). Notice that although the fatigue crack is oriented along the longitudinal scan direction and is very narrow, the perturbation around the circumference has the same dimension as the inducing coil.…”
Section: The Current Induction Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%