2012
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.86.023828
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electromagnetically induced transparency in an inverted-Ysystem of interacting cold atoms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
43
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This phenomenon has been well explained with an effective method utilizing a superatom (SA) model and considering the two-photon correlation in the mean-field approximation [35]. Subsequently, some investigations on other complex level configurations [36,37] adopt this method and exhibit novel phenomena such as normal (abnormal) cooperative optical nonlinearity.However, the theory approach still has its own deficiencies: the weakprobe field approximation is adopted but large probe intensity is used in the numerical calculation. Meanwhile, some high-order components of the SA population, which play important roles in the numerical calculation under the condition of strong probe filed, are neglected.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This phenomenon has been well explained with an effective method utilizing a superatom (SA) model and considering the two-photon correlation in the mean-field approximation [35]. Subsequently, some investigations on other complex level configurations [36,37] adopt this method and exhibit novel phenomena such as normal (abnormal) cooperative optical nonlinearity.However, the theory approach still has its own deficiencies: the weakprobe field approximation is adopted but large probe intensity is used in the numerical calculation. Meanwhile, some high-order components of the SA population, which play important roles in the numerical calculation under the condition of strong probe filed, are neglected.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In previous studies [35][36][37], by considering the weak-probe and low-intensity limit, it is assumed that fewer than two atoms are excited out of level g | 〉 on average in a blockade sphere, in which case we can think that RR Σ is only contributed by state R (1) | 〉 and can be written as . When we calculate the first-, second-and third-order populations of the Rydberg state, we should change the probe and coupling coefficients (Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DDI may result in an essential blockade effect preventing the excitation of more than one atom into a high Rydberg state within a mesoscopic volume of several micrometers in radius [22][23][24][25][26]. In fact, dipole blockade is the basis of many promising proposals for manipulating quantum states of atoms and photons [27][28][29], generating reliable single photons [30][31][32], simulating many-body quantum systems [33,34], revealing some novel behaviors in EIT [35][36][37][38][39][40][41], etc. For driven ensembles of cold Rydberg atoms, however, relevant theoretical descriptions are rather challenging because the dimension of a many-body multilevel system increases exponentially with the number of Rydberg atoms in the Hilbert space.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It is worth stressing that Rydberg-EIT studies [26,27] provide us with a good opportunity of efficient light ma nipulation, e.g., to attain cooperative optical nonlinearities [28][29][30] and essential photon-photon interactions [31][32][33]. Such nonlinear effects then make it possible to generate stable and reliable single photons [34,35] via the so-called photon blockade mechanism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here we adopt the superatom (SA) strategy in a meanfield sense [28][29][30] to study an ensemble of cold rubidium atoms driven into the four-level Y configuration with two high Rydberg levels. These atoms may become strongly correlated only via self-blockade potentials (I) or also via cross blockade potentials (II) depending upon the choice of real Rydberg levels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%