2007
DOI: 10.2116/analsci.23.121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electromagnetophoretic Force Measurement of a Single Binding Interaction between Lectin and Yeast Cell Surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The apparent conductivities of polystyrene particles and yeast cells in 1 M KCl solution were 0.019 and 0.075 S cm -1 , respectively. 27,30 The separation medium was 0.155 M KCl solution, which had an ionic strength nearly equal to an isotonic solution used for the study of biological cells, containing 20% urea in order to match the densities of the polystyrene particles and the solution to prevent the sedimentation of the particles. Moreover, the flow rate was increased by three times for increasing the throughput; the flow rate from inlet 1 and 2 were 3.99 and 16.01 μL h -1 , respectively.…”
Section: Separation Between Heterogeneous Particles By Microchip Elecmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The apparent conductivities of polystyrene particles and yeast cells in 1 M KCl solution were 0.019 and 0.075 S cm -1 , respectively. 27,30 The separation medium was 0.155 M KCl solution, which had an ionic strength nearly equal to an isotonic solution used for the study of biological cells, containing 20% urea in order to match the densities of the polystyrene particles and the solution to prevent the sedimentation of the particles. Moreover, the flow rate was increased by three times for increasing the throughput; the flow rate from inlet 1 and 2 were 3.99 and 16.01 μL h -1 , respectively.…”
Section: Separation Between Heterogeneous Particles By Microchip Elecmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[27][28][29] In the present study, we developed a new microchip separation method for microparticles utilizing EMP. For the microchip EMP, electrodes to apply the electric current can be placed outside of the microchip, and the magnetic field is produced easily by a permanent Nd-Fe-B magnet located under the microchip.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4][5][6] Furthermore, an electromagnetophoretic force was applied to dynamic force measurements of chemical interactions between a particle and a capillary wall and a dynamic force analysis of the breaking of interactions between a yeast cell and lectin on the wall of a capillary. [7][8][9][10] The advantages of using an electromagnetophoretic force for the separation of particles and the dynamic force measurement are that: (i) a non-contact migration of particles is possible, (ii) an open solution system is acceptable, and (iii) the separation force is easily controllable by an electric current. Usually, the electromagnetophoretic (EMP) force, FEMP, is represented by a simplified equation assuming a uniform electric current and a uniform magnetic field that are perpendicularly applied on a particle in an electrolyte solution, …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Laser photophoresis [11][12][13][14][15][16], driven by the radiation pressure of photons, allows us to estimate the reflectance, refractive index, and absorption coefficient and other optical properties of microparticles, and to separate them by utilizing the difference in such properties. Electromagnetophoresis [17][18][19][20][21][22], which is migration under a homogeneous magnetic field and an electric current, has great potential not only for characterizing microparticles by conductivity measurement, but also for measuring the adhesion force between microparticles in a liquid and the cell wall by measuring desorption current. Magnetophoresis [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] can be observed under an inhomogeneous magnetic field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%