2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.physleta.2021.127230
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electromechanical properties of ferroelectric polymers: Finsler geometry modeling and a Monte Carlo study

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, as shown in Figure 7d, P(VDF‐TrFE) 65/35 mol% has the lower maximum and remnant polarization values ( P s ~ 13.9 μC cm − and P r ~ 10.4 μC cm −2 in Figure 7c) than those of 80/20 mol% ( P s ~ 15.2 μC cm −‐2 and P r ~ 11.3 μC cm −2 in Figure 7a) and 75/25 mol% ( P s ~ 14.7 μC cm −‐2 and P r ~ 10.7 μC cm −2 in Figure 7b) under electrical field of 200 MV m −1 , respectively. Moreover, compared with ice‐water cooling samples, the P–E loops of annealing P(VDF‐TrFE) films gradually tend to rectangular shape and the coercivity field strength increases correspondingly with the increase of electric field, further indicating annealing favors the content of ferroelectric β phase 47–52 . The reason is that 140°C nearing T C of P(VDF‐TrFE) provides sufficient time for the arrangement of all‐trans molecular chains within the molecules.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, as shown in Figure 7d, P(VDF‐TrFE) 65/35 mol% has the lower maximum and remnant polarization values ( P s ~ 13.9 μC cm − and P r ~ 10.4 μC cm −2 in Figure 7c) than those of 80/20 mol% ( P s ~ 15.2 μC cm −‐2 and P r ~ 11.3 μC cm −2 in Figure 7a) and 75/25 mol% ( P s ~ 14.7 μC cm −‐2 and P r ~ 10.7 μC cm −2 in Figure 7b) under electrical field of 200 MV m −1 , respectively. Moreover, compared with ice‐water cooling samples, the P–E loops of annealing P(VDF‐TrFE) films gradually tend to rectangular shape and the coercivity field strength increases correspondingly with the increase of electric field, further indicating annealing favors the content of ferroelectric β phase 47–52 . The reason is that 140°C nearing T C of P(VDF‐TrFE) provides sufficient time for the arrangement of all‐trans molecular chains within the molecules.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, compared with ice-water cooling samples, the P-E loops of annealing P(VDF-TrFE) films gradually tend to rectangular shape and the coercivity field strength increases correspondingly with the increase of electric field, further indicating annealing favors the content of ferroelectric β phase. [47][48][49][50][51][52] The reason is that 140 C nearing T C of P(VDF-TrFE) provides sufficient time for the arrangement of all-trans molecular chains within the molecules. However, when annealing P(VDF-TrFE) at 200 C exceeding the melting point of the films, the crystal region is destroyed and is obliged to recrystallize when the temperature drops from 200 C to room temperature quickly.…”
Section: Influence Of Annealing Temperature On Electrical Properties ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, room temperature ferroelectromagnetism is best suited for NVFeRAM and soft magnetic memory applications [20]. The electromechanical nature is evinced by the coexistence of mechanical and electrical properties in some ferroelectric polymer materials [21] because of (i) large deformations under external electric fields, (ii) the negative longitudinal piezoelectric coefficient, and (iii) the response of mechanical strain to the square of the polarization [22]. Hence, these properties of materials are commonly used in design actuators [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, using Finsler geometry (FG) modeling, which is a mathematical framework for describing anisotropic phenomena [36][37][38], we study two possible models for the deformation of skyrmions and magnetic stripes [39]. In one of the models, the FMI coefficient is deformed to be λ x = λ y , while DMI is isotropic, and in the other model, the DMI coefficient is deformed to be D x = D y while FMI is isotropic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%