The EM-Σ∆ (electromechanical sigma-delta) approach is a concise and efficient way to realize the digital interface for micro-electromechanical systems (MEMS) accelerometers. However, including a fixed MEMS element makes the synthesizing of the EM-Σ∆ loop an intricate problem. The loop parameters of EM-Σ∆ can not be directly mapped from existing electrical Σ∆ modulator, and the synthesizing problem relies an experience-dependent trail-and-error procedure. In this paper, we provide a new point of view to consider the EM-Σ∆ loop. The EM-Σ∆ loop is analyzed in detail from aspects of the signal loop, displacement modulation path and digital quantization loop. By taking a separate consideration of the signal loop and quantization noise loop, the design strategy is made clear and straightforward. On this basis, a discrete-time PID (proportional integral differential) loop compensator is introduced which enhances the in-band loop gain and suppresses the displacement modulation path, and hence, achieves better performance in system linearity and stability. A fifth-order EM-Σ∆ accelerometer system was designed and fabricated using 0.35 µm CMOS-BCD technology. Based on proposed architecture and synthesizing procedure, the design effort was saved, and the in-band performance, linearity and stability were improved. A noise floor of 1 µg/ √ Hz, with a bandwidth 1 kHz and a dynamic range of 140 dB was achieved.Sensors 2020, 20, 91 2 of 17 processing. Moreover, the use of one-bit feedback linearizes the inherent second-order relationship between voltage and electrostatic force effectively [6-10]. Despite the advantages mentioned above, there are still obstacles for a simple implementation. The obstacles mainly come from the MEMS sensing element. Since the limited in-band gain is provided by the MEMS sensing element [11], the total in-band characteristic is degenerated compared to a purely electrical Σ∆ modulator [8]; thus, high-order modulation is inevitable. Meanwhile, in order to suppress the Brownian noise, the sensing element is typically packaged in a vacuum cavity [9,11], resulting a highly under-damped subsystem. Moreover, this second order section is fixed and the inside first-order node (which is velocity) is inaccessible for an electrical circuit [12]. These negative factors mixed together seriously aggravate the synthesizing of loop parameters, which is already a complicated problem for a purely electrical Σ∆ modulator.This problem can be divided into two aspects. First is the stabilization of the EM-Σ∆ loop. For an electrical Σ∆ loop, the proof of stability has not been rigorously established; approximate models and empirical observations are used for stability check [8,13]. The situation is worse for EM-Σ∆, since there is an unchangeable highly under-damped MEMS structure. For most researchers [7-9,14] the first thing is to degenerate this second order section into a first-order one by introducing an adjustable zero. Then, the traditional design strategy for electrical Σ∆ can be used. However, this approach will int...