1998
DOI: 10.1016/s1050-6411(96)00033-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electromyographic response of the trunk muscles to postural perturbation in sitting subjects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
36
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
4
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The decreased muscle activation with anticipation was in accordance with earlier studies where the peak muscle activation amplitudes were approximately 70% greater during unexpected conditions (Lavender et al 1989;Marras et al 1987). Expectation can modify trunk muscle activation in certain conditions of sudden upper limb (Lavender et al 1989) and trunk (Thomas et al 1998) loading, but does not seem to have an effect on trunk muscle activation during certain postural perturbations (Granata et al 2001;Zedka et al 1998). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The decreased muscle activation with anticipation was in accordance with earlier studies where the peak muscle activation amplitudes were approximately 70% greater during unexpected conditions (Lavender et al 1989;Marras et al 1987). Expectation can modify trunk muscle activation in certain conditions of sudden upper limb (Lavender et al 1989) and trunk (Thomas et al 1998) loading, but does not seem to have an effect on trunk muscle activation during certain postural perturbations (Granata et al 2001;Zedka et al 1998). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In sudden trunk loading, expectation increased trunk muscle activity prior to the load onset and decreased peak trunk muscle activity after the load onset (Thomas et al 1998). However, the equilibrium reactions of seated subjects were not affected by expectation or vision (Zedka et al 1998) and expectation did not change the preparatory muscle activity levels in an experiment by Granata et al (2001). Thus, there appears to be variation in the effect of expectation on trunk muscle activity during sudden loading.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Genthon et al 32) reported that in a study of stroke patients, biomechanical evaluation showed that cooperative contractions of the abdominalis and latissimus dorsi, which control flexion and extension of trunk, were damaged more than of the internal and external oblique abdominal muscles, which control lateral movement (p<0.05) 32,33) . Van Nes et al 34) reported that forward-backward balance control in the sitting position was compensated by the lower extremities, and right-left balance control in the sitting position was solely dependent on trunk control.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…60 Several studies investigating muscle latency times for voluntary and unexpected movements have been conducted on the knee, 16,59,66,67 ankle, 6,25,34,44 and trunk. 13,22,24,68 For these joints, temporal muscle recruitment patterns have been examined in a feedback as well as in a feedforward manner. However, research on recruitment patterns and timing of muscle activity in the shoulder is limited.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%