1959
DOI: 10.1001/archopht.1959.04220040119017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electromyography of Human Saccadic Eye Movements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
1
1

Year Published

1965
1965
1989
1989

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…During a normal saccade there is a brief (up to 150 m.sec.) burst of activity in the prime mover with complete inhibition of its antagonist muscle (Tamler et al, 1959). In contrast, in the present subject, motor units were recruited only slowly in the prime mover with a parallel slowed inhibition of motor units in the antagonist.…”
Section: Case Descriptioncontrasting
confidence: 76%
“…During a normal saccade there is a brief (up to 150 m.sec.) burst of activity in the prime mover with complete inhibition of its antagonist muscle (Tamler et al, 1959). In contrast, in the present subject, motor units were recruited only slowly in the prime mover with a parallel slowed inhibition of motor units in the antagonist.…”
Section: Case Descriptioncontrasting
confidence: 76%
“…The inhibition of the activity of the antagonist caused by reciprocal innervation is seen in all published records (see e.g. Bj6rk & Kugelberg, 1953;Miller, 1958;Tamler, Marg, Jampolsky & Nawratski;1959, Breinin, 1962. It is also clear that the level of the activity in the agonist increases at the start of the saccade, but whereas the records of Bjork & Kugelberg (1953), Miller (1958), and Breinin (1962 show a gradation of activity during a saccade, those of Tamler et al (1959) show little variation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…At the beginning of a movement, there is increased activity (pulse) in the agonist muscles and a simultaneous inhibition of antagonist activity that rapidly accelerates the eye or the limb toward the desired new position (for eye movements, see Fuchs & Luschei, 1970; Miller, 1958; Robinson, 1970; Tamler, Marg, Jampolsky, & Nawratzki, 1959; Thomas, 1969; for limb movements, see Hallett, Shahani, & Young, 1975; Polit & Bizzi, 1979). The agonist activity subsides near the middle of the movement and is followed by a change in the steady-state activity (step) of opposing muscle groups, which serves to hold the new final position (for eye movements, see Fuchs & Luschei, 1970; Miller, 1958; Reinhart & Zuber, 1971; Tamler et al, 1959; for limb movements, see Polit & Bizzi, 1979). Thus, it appears that some common principles may underlie organization and control in both the eye and limb movement systems.…”
Section: Comparison Of Limb Movements and Saccadic Eye Movementsmentioning
confidence: 99%