2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.cplett.2007.07.078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron affinity of perhalogenated benzenes: A theoretical DFT study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…exactly C 2v ), however, its SOMO has a pure s* character. 13 Note that the C 6 Cl 6 À geometry optimised at the DFT:B3LYP level (obtained here and previously described 46 ) is very close to those predicted by a high level B2PLYP-D/aug-cc-pVTZ method. ‡ The geometry optimisation of C 6 Cl 5 OMe À in DMF resulted in a spontaneous C-Cl cleavage with the formation of a radicalion pair, (Cl À Á Á ÁC 6 Cl 4 OMe ) solv (see the caption of Fig.…”
Section: Molecular and Electronic Properties Of The Investigated Chlo...supporting
confidence: 80%
“…exactly C 2v ), however, its SOMO has a pure s* character. 13 Note that the C 6 Cl 6 À geometry optimised at the DFT:B3LYP level (obtained here and previously described 46 ) is very close to those predicted by a high level B2PLYP-D/aug-cc-pVTZ method. ‡ The geometry optimisation of C 6 Cl 5 OMe À in DMF resulted in a spontaneous C-Cl cleavage with the formation of a radicalion pair, (Cl À Á Á ÁC 6 Cl 4 OMe ) solv (see the caption of Fig.…”
Section: Molecular and Electronic Properties Of The Investigated Chlo...supporting
confidence: 80%
“…Indeed, in the series C 6 R 6 (R=F, Cl, Br, I) a gas‐phase v EA 1 is positive and equal (experiment/CCCSD(T)+ZPE calculations) to 0.53/0.55, 0.92/0.86, −/1.17, −/1.82 eV, respectively (exp. for C 6 H 6 : −1.17 eV), i. e ., revealing the same χ A ‐contradictive trend which, however, was not explained [53] . Accordingly, unexplained CV data reveal that amongst C 6 F 6 , [54] C 6 Cl 6 [55] and C 6 Br 6 [56] the former is the weakest, and the latter the strongest, one‐electron acceptor (C 6 I 6 was, seemingly, never studied due to very poor solubility in suitable solvents); for C 6 R 6 , E 1/2 =−2.49, −1.99 and −1.66 V (R=F, Cl and Br, respectively, vs .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The findings of this work clarify the previously unexplained situation with the EAA of C 6 R 6 (R=F, Cl, Br, I) benzenes, amongst which C 6 I 6 is a stronger electron acceptor than C 6 F 6 [53–56] …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations