“…Several reports (Liu et al, 1984;Gu et al, 1986; have described the production of inactivated vaccines with reliable protective effects, and haemagglutination and haemagglutination inhibition tests (HT and HIT respectively) were developed for the demonstration of the virus and specific antibodies (Liu et al, 1984;Pu et al, 1985;Duet al, 1986;Ohlinger et al, 1989). The earlier, rather controversial reports concerning the classification of RHDV (Liu et al, 1984;Du et al, 1986;Shen et al, 1986;Xu et al, 1988) were followed by several papers suggesting, on the basis of morphology, the size of the major structural proteins and density in CsC1, that RHDV is a calicivirus (Du et al, 1986;Deng et al, 1987 ;Ohlinger et al, 1989;~mid et al, 1989;Vali~ek et al, 1990). On the other hand, RHDV differs from known caliciviruses in several respects: its haemagglutinating activity and failure in all attempts to propagate it in vitro (Studdert, 1978;Cubitt, 1987;Carter et al, 1989).…”