2011
DOI: 10.1002/ejic.201100318
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron and Spin Density Topology of the H‐Cluster and Its Biomimetic Complexes

Abstract: , as well as due to the lack of understanding at the molecular level of the cluster's biosynthetic pathway. By using all of the proposed ligand compositions, we carried out a comprehensive electronic structure analysis by evaluating the topology of the electron density and, particularly, the atomic spin density distribution derived from various population analysis methods for the free dithiolate ligands, the biomimetic [2Fe] complexes, and the entire H-cluster embedded in its approximately 3.5 Å protein enviro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar experimental studies of a H-cluster model complex containing an azadithiolate-bridging ligand without any other nitrogen atoms in its environment yielded similar hyperfine coupling components as the enzyme, providing additional support for nitrogen as the bridgehead atom (Erdem et al, 2011). Further computational analysis of the H-cluster embedded in a 3.5 Å protein environment and compared to analogous model complexes has demonstrated notable distinctions between the paramagnetic properties of the bridgehead group in the enzyme and the models, suggesting that the network of interactions housing the H-cluster acts to limit the localization of atomic spin density at the bridgehead atom position (Giles et al, 2011). Clearly, there are still questions to be answered with regard to the composition and the potential mechanistic relevance of the nonprotein dithiolate of the H-cluster, ambiguities that would be resolved by some direct chemical composition analysis of the ligand itself or the elucidation of the mechanism of its biosynthesis.…”
Section: Structurementioning
confidence: 78%
“…Similar experimental studies of a H-cluster model complex containing an azadithiolate-bridging ligand without any other nitrogen atoms in its environment yielded similar hyperfine coupling components as the enzyme, providing additional support for nitrogen as the bridgehead atom (Erdem et al, 2011). Further computational analysis of the H-cluster embedded in a 3.5 Å protein environment and compared to analogous model complexes has demonstrated notable distinctions between the paramagnetic properties of the bridgehead group in the enzyme and the models, suggesting that the network of interactions housing the H-cluster acts to limit the localization of atomic spin density at the bridgehead atom position (Giles et al, 2011). Clearly, there are still questions to be answered with regard to the composition and the potential mechanistic relevance of the nonprotein dithiolate of the H-cluster, ambiguities that would be resolved by some direct chemical composition analysis of the ligand itself or the elucidation of the mechanism of its biosynthesis.…”
Section: Structurementioning
confidence: 78%
“…The surrounding protein framework finely-tunes the H-cluster and is considered to play an important role in regulating its catalytic activity, electronic properties, and potential hydride binding sites [14,23,130,[140][141][142][143]. Within the catalytic site are several conserved, charged residues that form the secondary coordination sphere, with exchangeable groups proposed to function in the transfer of protons, water coordination, and bonding interactions with the H cluster (Fig.…”
Section: Catalytic Site Structure and Coordination Spherementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The near-identical TM-S(TU) pre-edge intensities within the error of XAS data collection and analysis (Giles et al, 2011) do not correspond to identical S 3p contributions, since the Co 2+ complex has three d-electron holes and four absorbers, while the Ni 2+ complex has two holes for six absorbers. The renormalized intensity values are 0.8 units and 1.7 units per hole for [Co(TU) 4 ] 2+ and [Ni(TU) 6 ] 2+ , respectively, which now clearly indicate a ca double TM-S bond covalency in the octahedral Ni 2+ versus tetrahedral Co 2+ complex, as expected from the difference in the number of ligands and the efficiency of the M-L overlap between the two coordination environments.…”
Section: Determination Of Normalized Pre-edge Intensity (D 0 ) For Coordinated Ligandsmentioning
confidence: 96%