1982
DOI: 10.1088/0022-3727/15/8/001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron attachment in binary mixtures of electronegative and buffer gases

Abstract: The ratio of the electron attachment coefficient eta to the gas pressure p (reduced to 0 degrees C) evaluated from the Townsend current growth curves in binary mixtures of electronegative gases (SF6, CCl2F2, CO2) and buffer gases (N2, Ar, air) clearly indicate that the eta /p ratios do not scale as the partial pressure of electronegative gas in the mixture. Extensive calculations carried out using data experimentally obtained have shown that the attachment coefficient of the mixture eta mix can be expressed as… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While, figure (9) compares the present ionization coefficient values with previous results. It is seen that, the present calculation is in agreement with experimental and theoretical values (Settaouti and Settaouti, 2005), (Aschwanden, 1985), (Shimozuma et al, 1982), (Siddagangappa et al, 1982), but the theoretical results of (Itoh et al, 1993) lower than that of present results for all range of E/N values. which (α/N=η/N) is obtained in the present calculation is approximately equal to (361Td), in agreement with the results of: 361Td (Aschwanden, 1985), 362 Td (Tezcan et al, 2010), 362 Td (Itoh et al, 1993), 361Td (Mohammed, 2009), 362 Td (Itoh et al, 1988).…”
Section: The Ionization Coefficientsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…While, figure (9) compares the present ionization coefficient values with previous results. It is seen that, the present calculation is in agreement with experimental and theoretical values (Settaouti and Settaouti, 2005), (Aschwanden, 1985), (Shimozuma et al, 1982), (Siddagangappa et al, 1982), but the theoretical results of (Itoh et al, 1993) lower than that of present results for all range of E/N values. which (α/N=η/N) is obtained in the present calculation is approximately equal to (361Td), in agreement with the results of: 361Td (Aschwanden, 1985), 362 Td (Tezcan et al, 2010), 362 Td (Itoh et al, 1993), 361Td (Mohammed, 2009), 362 Td (Itoh et al, 1988).…”
Section: The Ionization Coefficientsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…It is seen from [42] and Siddagangappa, et al [43] yield respectively the highest and lowest degrees of consistency with the assumed swarm and cross section data.…”
Section: Ion Mobility Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…where the dash-dot curve is a fit to the data of Siddagangappa and co-workers [43] and the solid and dashed curves are fits to the data of Verhaart [42] using respectively numerical and analytical representations of the relevant cross sections (see Table I Best fits to the indicated strength data for the highest degrees of consistency (see Table II). [48] (see Table III).…”
Section: Ion Mobility Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, in order to analyze the dielectric strength of [12]. 2 N is a neutral gas, its chemical property is stable, the electrons almost never attach with the other particles, its attachment coefficient is about 0 [13], therefore ionization is the most important thing in the electrons transport, the density-reduced ionization coefficient …”
Section: Effective Ionization Coefficientmentioning
confidence: 99%