2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.mee.2006.05.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron beam induced SiO2 etch selectivity and its application to oxide nano-aperture formation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Etching progressed vertically in the central region and laterally in the peripheral region, both for times shorter than 6 s. After 6 s, once a hole was formed, the diameters of the nanopore and the shallow-etched region further increased at a slower rate, as can be observed in the time trace of both diameters ( figure 5(B)). Such nanopore expansion kinetics were previously observed for nanopores drilled by a high-energy focused electron beam in Si 3 N 4 [17] and Al 2 O 3 [39], and, as we have previously reported, for FEBIE nanopore formation [18]. Initial expansion rates of 6 and 17.5 nm s −1 were observed for the central and peripheral regions, respectively, for times shorter than 10 s. For times longer than 10 s, the etching rate was reduced to 1 and 4 nm s −1 , respectively.…”
Section: Nanopore Size and Shapesupporting
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Etching progressed vertically in the central region and laterally in the peripheral region, both for times shorter than 6 s. After 6 s, once a hole was formed, the diameters of the nanopore and the shallow-etched region further increased at a slower rate, as can be observed in the time trace of both diameters ( figure 5(B)). Such nanopore expansion kinetics were previously observed for nanopores drilled by a high-energy focused electron beam in Si 3 N 4 [17] and Al 2 O 3 [39], and, as we have previously reported, for FEBIE nanopore formation [18]. Initial expansion rates of 6 and 17.5 nm s −1 were observed for the central and peripheral regions, respectively, for times shorter than 10 s. For times longer than 10 s, the etching rate was reduced to 1 and 4 nm s −1 , respectively.…”
Section: Nanopore Size and Shapesupporting
confidence: 74%
“…This shape was found to depend on the preparation methodology and specific fabrication conditions. While nanopores prepared by direct ion drilling adopt a conical shape [27], the formation of hourglass-shaped nanopores was found for nanopores prepared by direct focused electron beam drilling [17,28,29]. Since the shape of nanopores prepared by the FEBIE process has not been revealed yet, we present here a detailed characterization of thus prepared nanopores.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Focused electron-beam-induced etching (FEBIE) is an attractive process for rapid and maskless fabrication of nanometric features [22][23][24][25]. In contrast to the physical mechanisms involved in mass removal when using high electron or ion beams as mentioned above, in the FEBIE process a chemical reaction involving a precursor gas is induced by an electron beam and results in etching of the substrate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 The anisotropic wet etching technique has been widely employed in the formation of silicon patterns. [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] Using KOH-based aqueous solution, a Si͑111͒ plane is usually formed due to its lowest etching rate. 7 Nevertheless, alcoholic moderators are introduced into the KOH solution, 17 and the etching rate on Si͑110͒ is reduced dramatically, thereby the Si͑110͒ plane could be obtained.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%