1992
DOI: 10.1016/0168-9002(92)90892-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron beam injector for longitudinal beam physics experiments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(1) and (10) it follows that the longitudinal electric field F. , inside of the beam is independent of the radial position. The experimental parameters show that the reactive skin depth c/to&, where c is the speed of light and m& is the plasma frequency, is muck larger than the beam radius a.…”
Section: -mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…(1) and (10) it follows that the longitudinal electric field F. , inside of the beam is independent of the radial position. The experimental parameters show that the reactive skin depth c/to&, where c is the speed of light and m& is the plasma frequency, is muck larger than the beam radius a.…”
Section: -mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The relation (10) can also be deduced from previous works based on the field theory approach [15][16][17] and can be found in Ref. [18], where the method based on I)uid equations was employed.…”
Section: -mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It consists of a short-pulse electron beam injector, a resistive-wall channel, the diagnostics [7,8]. The injector contains a gridded electron gun, which can produce the desired beam parameters with localized perturbations of variable strength [12]. The key component of the resistive-wall channel is a glass tube of about 1 m in length and 3.81 cm in inner diameter.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3. The electron bunch was produced by a short-pulse electron beam injector which consisted of a variable-perveance electron gun, an induction acceleration module, and three matching lenses [8]. Particularly, the beam velocity distribution at the second energy analyzer, i.e.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%