1997
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.79.3526
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron Capture and Loss Processes in the Interaction of Hydrogen, Oxygen, and Fluorine Atoms and Negative Ions with a MgO(100) Surface

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
55
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This as well as appearance of quantized states, due to confinement [5], would obviously affect electron capture and loss probabilities; capture or loss would, e.g., be inhibited in the bandgap region, and the description of it would need to be different. In the case of discrete states, non-resonant velocity-dependent charge transfer processes [29][30][31] may play a role as for dielectric surfaces and should be treated using a molecular description, as this has been done also for ionic solids [32,33]. Finally, it has also been suggested [14] that perhaps defect sites on the cluster or interaction with adatoms, atoms at kinks, and boundaries may somehow play a role.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This as well as appearance of quantized states, due to confinement [5], would obviously affect electron capture and loss probabilities; capture or loss would, e.g., be inhibited in the bandgap region, and the description of it would need to be different. In the case of discrete states, non-resonant velocity-dependent charge transfer processes [29][30][31] may play a role as for dielectric surfaces and should be treated using a molecular description, as this has been done also for ionic solids [32,33]. Finally, it has also been suggested [14] that perhaps defect sites on the cluster or interaction with adatoms, atoms at kinks, and boundaries may somehow play a role.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But it has been found that for ionic crystals such as, for instance, LiF, charge exchange proceeds via capture of electrons from the anionic sites of the surface in a binary ion-atom interaction. [42][43][44] And once the negative ion is formed it cannot be destroyed by resonant electron loss ͑as in the case of metals͒ because of the band gap of the ionic crystal. It is safe to expect a similar behavior here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ion fraction was found to be large: 80% at 1 keV. A description of electron transfer for MgO can be found in the original papers [44][45][46][47][48][49][50]. We recall briefly that in the case of MgO, when the F atom approaches a lattice O atom (O dÀ negative ion site; d is of the order of 2) the F À level (electron affinity = 3.4 eV) is shifted closer into resonance with the deep lying O(2p) related levels (about 8 eV below vacuum level) because of the effect of the Madelung potential, induced by the surrounding positive charges.…”
Section: Negative Ion Fractionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is not the case of dielectric surfaces where significantly fewer studies have been performed [44]. Recent years have witnessed a considerable activity centred on wide band gap ionic insulator surfaces like MgO and alkali halides; experimental and theoretical work [45][46][47][48] performed has led to a fairly good understanding of the specific mechanisms that govern the charge transfer dynamics that is quite distinct from that of metals. In the case of metals charge transfer is generally described in a delocalised, jellium model type, free electron description of the solid .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%