1980
DOI: 10.1021/ja00530a021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron-diffraction investigations of the molecular structures of cis- and trans-1,2-dimethyldiborane

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

1980
1980
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The B−C, B−H term , and B−H bridg. bond distances with average values of 1.574(4), 1.09(3), and 1.24(3) Å, respectively, are slightly shorter than those observed for [MeBH(μ-H)] 2 or [(Me 3 Si) 3 CBH(μ-H)] 2 , and the B···B separation in 4 with a value of 1.787(5) Å lies between those reported for [MeBH(μ-H)] 2 or [(Me 3 Si) 3 CBH(μ-H)] 2 . The terphenyl substituents are rotated 71.9° with respect to each other, which may be a result of steric repulsion considering that the related dimeric aluminum hydrides [2,6-Mes 2 C 6 H 3 AlH(μ-H)] 2 and [2,6-Trip 2 C 6 H 3 AlH(μ-H)] 2 (Trip = 2,4,6- i -Pr 3 C 6 H 3 ) feature an almost parallel alignment of the terphenyl substituents.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…The B−C, B−H term , and B−H bridg. bond distances with average values of 1.574(4), 1.09(3), and 1.24(3) Å, respectively, are slightly shorter than those observed for [MeBH(μ-H)] 2 or [(Me 3 Si) 3 CBH(μ-H)] 2 , and the B···B separation in 4 with a value of 1.787(5) Å lies between those reported for [MeBH(μ-H)] 2 or [(Me 3 Si) 3 CBH(μ-H)] 2 . The terphenyl substituents are rotated 71.9° with respect to each other, which may be a result of steric repulsion considering that the related dimeric aluminum hydrides [2,6-Mes 2 C 6 H 3 AlH(μ-H)] 2 and [2,6-Trip 2 C 6 H 3 AlH(μ-H)] 2 (Trip = 2,4,6- i -Pr 3 C 6 H 3 ) feature an almost parallel alignment of the terphenyl substituents.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…One of the early successes in this field was Linus Pauling’s work in 1930 where it was shown that the rotational barrier function in the crystal may be presented in the first approximation as a cosine wave with a period equal to θ/ n , where θ is angle of rotational axis relative to the equilibrium position and n is the order of the symmetry axis of the molecule having the rotational axis. In the words of Dunitz and co-workers, “In a sense, one can say that spectroscopy sees the rate at which molecules cross the barrier, while diffraction sees the bottom of the potential well; we derive roughly the same barrier height as long as the potential is approximately sinusoidal.” This approach allowed us to estimate the height of the barrier of rotation based on the analysis of thermal vibrations in the X-ray structures in the framework of the theory of translation/libration/screw (TLS) in numerous papers. As expected by the shape-conforming nature of the short-range forces responsible for close-packing interactions of molecular crystals, the rotational frequencies and activation energies for a set of crystalline rotors correlate well with the molecular symmetry of their corresponding rotational axes . Previously in our study the correlation between the environment symmetry of coronene and its rotational mobility was supposed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Der B•••B-Abstand nimmt von 11 (1.791(2) Å), über 17 1.817(3) Å nach 18 (1.847(3) Die B-C Bindungslängen bleiben unverändert und sind vergleichbar mit literaturbekannten Verbindungen. 107,113 In 17 liegen die B-H Bindungsabstände bei B(1)-H(1A) = 1.…”
Section: Charakterisierung Von 17 Und 18unclassified