1984
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.30.1199
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron emission and positron production in deep inelastic heavy-ion reactions

Abstract: Atomic excitations are used to obtain information on the Course of a nuclear reaction. Employing a semiclassical picture we calculate the emission of S electrons and positrons in deep inelastic nuclear reactions for the example of U + U collisions incorporating nuclear trajectories resulting from two different nuclear friction models. The emission spectra exhibit characteristic deviations from those expected for elastic Coulomb scattering. The theoretical probabilities are compared with reCent experimental dat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

1985
1985
1997
1997

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The coupled-channels approach has been developed by Reinhardt et al and uses an adiabatic basis for the quasi-atomic eigenstates calculated in monopole approximation [41,42]. The calculated spectra are weighted with the experimental impact parameter distribution corresponding to each collision class.…”
Section: Binary Elastic U+au Collisionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coupled-channels approach has been developed by Reinhardt et al and uses an adiabatic basis for the quasi-atomic eigenstates calculated in monopole approximation [41,42]. The calculated spectra are weighted with the experimental impact parameter distribution corresponding to each collision class.…”
Section: Binary Elastic U+au Collisionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[16]. The coupled channels equations for the transition amplitudes from state~i ) to state~j ) are given by with the initial condition that a; (t =oo) = $, and an initial configuration of occupied states.…”
Section: Delta Electronsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is steepest for large values of ~ and decreases if the deceleration becomes more abrupt (shorter times ~) with a tendency towards a limiting slope for z .~ 10-23 S. In order to obtain absolute predictions which can be compared with measurements, a full coupled channel calculation, also including Pl/2 states, is required which could increase the probabilities by about an order of magnitude. Furthermore an ansatz for the outgoing trajectory [22] and its impact parameter dependence for close collisions is needed. Electron screening effects are negligible [23].…”
Section: I~(t)__l~rutherford (T) 1 + E (~-~~ (16)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We suggest to utilize energetic photons and electrons as probes of the nuclear reaction process at intermediate energies, because their emission mechanisms are well understood and their final state interactions are negligible. While lepton-pairs and photons are recognized as experimental signals for ultra-relativistic nuclear reactions [7], electrons, positrons and photons are known to reflect nuclear sticking times in low-energy collisions [8,22]. More than 20 years ago a bremsstrahlung experiment was proposed [9] to measure the nuclear time delay in order to offer an unambiguous separation between compound nucleus reactions and direct reactions by utilizing the fact, that the compound nucleus reactions are delayed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%