1987
DOI: 10.1088/0022-3700/20/21/023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron excitation of the 1s22s22p52Po3/2-2Po1/2transition and analysis of the 1s22s2p6nl resonances for Ne II and Mg IV

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
11
1

Year Published

1989
1989
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We are currently unable to explain this disagreement, as our measured strength of [Ne ii] 12.8 m agrees closely with the value reported by Dinerstein et al (2003), as do our derived electron temperature and density values. We also employed a collision strength of 0.318 (Griffin et al 2001), which agrees closely with their value of 0.306 taken from Johnson & Kingston (1987). On the other hand, the close agreement in the case of sulfur is strong evidence that the ionization stages above S +3 in DdDm-1 are relatively unpopulated.…”
Section: Numerical Analysissupporting
confidence: 60%
“…We are currently unable to explain this disagreement, as our measured strength of [Ne ii] 12.8 m agrees closely with the value reported by Dinerstein et al (2003), as do our derived electron temperature and density values. We also employed a collision strength of 0.318 (Griffin et al 2001), which agrees closely with their value of 0.306 taken from Johnson & Kingston (1987). On the other hand, the close agreement in the case of sulfur is strong evidence that the ionization stages above S +3 in DdDm-1 are relatively unpopulated.…”
Section: Numerical Analysissupporting
confidence: 60%
“…This is within 3% of our results. The two-state R-matrix calculation [7] yields values of F for T=<40000 K. This is 6% lower than our result at 40000 K.…”
Section: Pacs: 3480dcontrasting
confidence: 88%
“…Our threshold value for/2 is 0.36. This is approximately 5% higher than the value 0.344 obtained by two-state R-matrix method [7]. This suggests that coupling between the states with configuration 2p431 and the states with configurations 2p s and 2 s 2 p 6 is weak.…”
Section: Pacs: 3480dmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To date, close-coupling calculations of electron-impact excitation of Ne + have been restricted to the fine-structure transition: 2s 2 2p 5 2 P 3/2 → 2 P 1/2 . Johnson and Kingston [2] and later Saraph and Tully [3] employed large configuration-interaction (CI) expansions of the target, but included only the two LS terms 2s 2 2p 5 2 P and 2s2p 6 2 S in their close-coupling expansion; they then employed the program JAJOM [4] to transform the scattering matrices from LS to intermediate coupling and thereby determine the collision strengths for the finestructure transition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%