2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.physrep.2008.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron impact dissociation of oxygen-containing molecules–A critical review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
169
0
5

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 196 publications
(179 citation statements)
references
References 632 publications
5
169
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The abundance of ozone during calibration was checked by recording the QMS signal at mass number 48. Only minute trace amounts of ozone could be found, although the cross section for electron impact ionization of O 3 in the QMS ion source is higher than for O 2 (McConkey et al, 2008). Ozone is not produced directly in the discharge but in its afterglow via recombination of atomic oxygen (Normand et al, 1995).…”
Section: Uncertainties Sources Of Error and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The abundance of ozone during calibration was checked by recording the QMS signal at mass number 48. Only minute trace amounts of ozone could be found, although the cross section for electron impact ionization of O 3 in the QMS ion source is higher than for O 2 (McConkey et al, 2008). Ozone is not produced directly in the discharge but in its afterglow via recombination of atomic oxygen (Normand et al, 1995).…”
Section: Uncertainties Sources Of Error and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This shift, however, affects the QMS results both for O 2 and for atomic oxygen. Their ratio is the relevant quantity for the calibration, and with an observed energy deviation of 1.5 eV the measured atomic oxygen density would be lower by 8 %, based on the literature values for electron impact ionization (Laher and Gilmore, 1990;McConkey et al, 2008). Calibration of the QMS is done by recording its readings at a series of partial pressures of O 2 and CH 4 , respectively, compared to the output from a cold cathode gauge (Pfeiffer PKR 251) with an accuracy of ±30 %.…”
Section: Uncertainties Sources Of Error and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is unlikely to be a definitive assignment. Ionization cross section measurements have been made [86], but these include no data for energies less than 40 eV. We have chosen not to attempt an extrapolation into the energy range of interest in the present work, and we have instead used the theoretical results of Joshipura et al [61].…”
Section: Electron Impact Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cross-sections for H 2 O and NH 3 are from Lampe et al (1957). Tetraethoxysilane (TEOS) is shown as one of the few large molecules with a measured crosssection (McConkey et al 2008). The vertical scale is relative but is normalized to two at a molecular weight of 80 because the sensitivity of the AMS is usually referenced to the nitrate ions from ammonium nitrate and a factor of about two is appropriate if roughly half of the ions from ammonium nitrate are NO 2 + or other nitrate fragments (Canagaratna et al 2007).…”
Section: Number Density In Free Molecular Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%