2008
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.77.012704
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron-impact excitation ofXΣg+1(v=0)to theet al.

Abstract: states in N 2 from the X 1 ⌺ g + ͑vЉ =0͒ ground level are presented. The DCSs were obtained from energy-loss spectra in the region of 12 to 13.82 eV measured at incident energies of 17.5, 20, 30, 50, and 100 eV and for scattering angles ranging from 2°to 130°. The analysis of the spectra follows a different algorithm from that employed in a previous study of N 2 for the valence states ͓Khakoo et al. Phys. Rev. A 71, 062703 ͑2005͔͒, since the 1 ⌸ u and 1 ⌺ u + states form strongly interactingRydberg-valence ser… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

7
37
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
7
37
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These observations are supported by the ratio of 100 eV and 20 eV excitation functions deduced by Ajello et al (1989) and Malone et al (2012). The former found a ratio of 3.3 in the fluorescence signal of b (16), and the latter deduced a value of 1.3 averaged over b (v = 0-10) by analyzing the electron energy-loss measurements of Khakoo et al (2008). The difference between these two measurements is in agreement with the vibrational dependence observed here.…”
Section: Relative Excitation By 20 and 100 Ev Electronssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…These observations are supported by the ratio of 100 eV and 20 eV excitation functions deduced by Ajello et al (1989) and Malone et al (2012). The former found a ratio of 3.3 in the fluorescence signal of b (16), and the latter deduced a value of 1.3 averaged over b (v = 0-10) by analyzing the electron energy-loss measurements of Khakoo et al (2008). The difference between these two measurements is in agreement with the vibrational dependence observed here.…”
Section: Relative Excitation By 20 and 100 Ev Electronssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…[1][2][3][4] On the experimental side, a variety of techniques have been employed to chart the dipole-allowed absorption spectrum of N 2 which begins at 100 nm and extends to shorter wavelengths, thus restricting optical experiments to windowless techniques. Electron-energy-loss spectroscopy has revealed many prominent features at low resolution [5][6][7] which have been recorded with greater precision by means of classical spectroscopy in emission [8][9][10] and in absorption. [11][12][13] The finest resolution has been achieved by using combinations of molecular beams and narrow-band tunable extreme ultraviolet (XUV) laser sources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These 3 u levels are not accessible by optical transitions from the X 1 + g ground state, so have been observed only sparsely and often by indirect means. 7,45,46 An experimentally refined set of electronic-transition moments was incorporated into the CSE model 47 and allowed for the quantitative reproduction of experimental absolute f-values for many 14 N 2 transitions to 1 u excited-levels. Fourier-transform spectroscopy (FTS) is a powerful tool which is widely used for studies at infrared and visible wavelengths, and has been extended to the vacuum-ultraviolet (VUV) by one previous instrument.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is therefore not surprising that significant effort, particularly at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) and also more recently at the Fullerton campus of the University of California [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15], has gone into measuring differential cross sections (DCSs) and integral cross sections for the electron impact excitation of the electronic states in N 2 . A summary of the early results can be found in Ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A summary of the early results can be found in Ref. [16], while those from the more recent measurements are detailed in the JPL/Fullerton papers [11][12][13][14][15]. Unfortunately, despite all these endeavors, if we were to characterize the level of agreement between these studies, over the common energy, angular range, or both, for the 17 lower-lying N 2 electronic states, then we could only conclude that it remains "patchy" at best.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%