1992
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.45.1602
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron-impact excitation of then1Plevels of helium: Theory and experiment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
49
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
8
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 1 P transition. Our FBA results are compared with those of Cartwright et al 25 We find agreement between the two calculations in the scattering angle intervals [0,20] and [60,100]. A small disagreement is seen in the interval ]20, 60[.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…2 1 P transition. Our FBA results are compared with those of Cartwright et al 25 We find agreement between the two calculations in the scattering angle intervals [0,20] and [60,100]. A small disagreement is seen in the interval ]20, 60[.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…This can be attributed to the fact that the angular resolution error of the apparatus is possibly larger for He atoms than for other targets. The evaluation of the correction to be applied to the data of [16,17] due to forward elastic scattering in He is difficult to perform on the basis of existing experimental [55] and theoretical data [7,27,56]. In particular, existing measurements of differential cross sections for elastic scattering [57], electronic excitation [58] and ionization [59] do not extend to very low scattering angles.…”
Section: Heliummentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The Ar data are within 4.4% from the [21]; full triangles, Dalba [16,17]; the open diamond at 3 KeV is from de Heer and Jansen [14]; continuous line, fit with (1). Ionization cross sections: open squares, de Heer and Jansen [14]; full inverted open triangles, Krishnakumar and Srivastava [36]; full squares Nagy et al [37]; continuous line, fit with (4) Excitation cross sections: open circles, FOMBT calculation from Cartwright [27]; continuous line, fit with (3); Elastic cross sections: full circles, de Heer et Jansen [14]; diamonds, de Heer and Jansen [53]; dot-dashed line, elastic cross section obtained as difference by (9) (i.e. fitted total less fitted excitation and ionization cross sections); dashed line, elastic cross section obtained as difference by (9) but fitting the total cross section data of [16,17] corrected for an error increasing from 0% at 200 eV up to 30% at 3000 eV [21]; full triangles, Zecca et al [18]; continuous line, fit with (1).…”
Section: Gasmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The processes of electron interactions with noble gas atoms are well studied. The cross sections for elastic and inelastic electron collisions with helium atoms are presented in (Rejoub et al, 2002;Saha, 1989;Cartwright & et al, 1992) and those with xenon atoms can be found in (Rejoub et al, 2002;NIFS;Hyman, 1979). Knowing the electron energy distribution function, it is possible to analyze the distribution of the power introduced into the discharge among the most important electron processes.…”
Section: Electron Energy Distribution Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%