1987
DOI: 10.1088/0029-5515/27/s1/002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron impact ionization data for the iron isonuclear sequence

Abstract: Atomic data for the electron impact ionization of ions in the iron isonuclear sequence are reviewed. The best available data are identified. Comments are made on current research activities leading to future data for iron ions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
53
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
53
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of this data About the ionization rates we would like to remark that recently Kato et al (1991) reviewed and compared the rates obtained with several empirical formulae used by Lotz (1967Lotz ( , 1968, by the Belfast group (Bell et al 1983 andLennon et al 1988), by AR85 and AR, and by Pindzola et al (1987). They conclude that generally the rate coefficient derived on the basis of experimental data of cross sections are in good agreement among the various authors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Most of this data About the ionization rates we would like to remark that recently Kato et al (1991) reviewed and compared the rates obtained with several empirical formulae used by Lotz (1967Lotz ( , 1968, by the Belfast group (Bell et al 1983 andLennon et al 1988), by AR85 and AR, and by Pindzola et al (1987). They conclude that generally the rate coefficient derived on the basis of experimental data of cross sections are in good agreement among the various authors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…For Fe viii, the recent measurements of Hahn et al (2015) were used, from the ionization threshold up to 1200 eV. They remain 30-40% lower than theoretical calculations of Arnaud & Raymond (1992), based on Pindzola et al (1987), and are in good agreement (10%) with D07. The reason for these discrepancies are similar to the case of Fe xi, as explained in section 3.16.1.…”
Section: Di: 3d and 4s Cross-sectionsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Electronic data is available at IAEA/ALADDIN [12]. We also note that previous CADW calculations for the electron-impact ionization of the Fe [13], Ni [14], Kr [15], Sn [16], Xe [16], and W [17] isonuclear sequences are being updated with RMPS and TDCC calculations for the atoms and low-charged ions. …”
Section: Isonuclear Sequence Databasesmentioning
confidence: 99%