2019
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.100.062701
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron-impact ionization ofW5+

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
26
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
1
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The fractional populations of the metastable levels are generally not known. Common assumptions are a statistical level distribution or a Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution which accounts for the plasma temperature in the ion source [21]. In principle, more detailed information about the metastable fractions can be obtained from comparisons with theoretical cross sections if these are known with sufficient precision.…”
Section: Cross Sectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fractional populations of the metastable levels are generally not known. Common assumptions are a statistical level distribution or a Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution which accounts for the plasma temperature in the ion source [21]. In principle, more detailed information about the metastable fractions can be obtained from comparisons with theoretical cross sections if these are known with sufficient precision.…”
Section: Cross Sectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study included 71 even and 50 odd configurations, having the highest values of configuration interaction strengths. This approach was previously successfully used to analyze energy levels, Auger cascades, electron-impact excitation, and ionization cross-sections [20][21][22].…”
Section: Theoretical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since, to our knowledge, there are no theoretical calculations of excitation cross-section for the 6s 2 6p 2 P o 1/2 → 6s 2 6d 2 D 5/2 transition available in the literature, we performed our own calculation of the excitation cross-section for this transition as well as for the 2 P o 1/2 → 2 D 3/2 transition using Flexible Atomic Code package (FAC) [19]. So far, FAC is the convenient tool for constructing high-quality wave functions of electron scattering on atoms and ions and has proven to be good for the analysis of energy levels, Auger cascades, electron-impact excitation, and ionization cross-sections [20][21][22]. Likewise, in the GRASP2k package used in the calculation [16], FAC also incorporates a core-valence correlation, configuration mixing, and relativistic effects, which are very important to account for in the case of such a heavy ion as singly charged lead.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…for ions in the ground configuration, the presence of metastable ions potentially influences the measured cross sections. Usually, the metastable fractions of ions are not known and must be inferred from detailed comparisons with theoretical calculations as shown recently, e.g., for W 5+ [11].…”
Section: Hybrid Scawd+lldw Cross Sectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the theory side, configuration-averaged distorted wave (CADW) calculations have been widely used for EISI calculations because of the efficiency of this method in generating large numbers of cross sections and plasma rate coefficients [7][8][9][10]. More elaborate level-resolved calculations have been carried out only for a limited number of ion species such as W 5+ [11], W 17+ [12], W 25+ [13], W 26+ [14], and W 27+ [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%