2016
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.94.052704
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron interaction with dimethyl disulfide in the low- and intermediate-energy range

Abstract: We report a joint theoretical-experimental investigation on elastic electron scattering by dimethyl disulfide (DMDS) in the low-and intermediate-energy regions. Experimental angular distributions of the elastically scattered electrons were measured in the 10-800 eV and 5 • -130 • range using a crossed electron beam-molecular beam geometry. The absolute values of the differential cross sections (DCS) were obtained using the relative-flow technique. Also, integral (ICS) and momentumtransfer (MTCS) cross sections… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(40 reference statements)
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fact that the first two resonances of their work are shifted to lower energies relative to ours is due to the different ways to account for the polarization effects in the calculations. The dependence of the position and width of resonances on the polarization potential is clearly shown in figure 3 in their work and was also discussed in some of our previous works [29,31]. Quantitatively, the present experimental ICS data agree very well with our calculated results using both the MCOP and IAM-AR, and with the SMCPP+Born ICS of Krupa et al [24] while the IAM-SCAR calculations [24] overestimate systematically our experimental data.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The fact that the first two resonances of their work are shifted to lower energies relative to ours is due to the different ways to account for the polarization effects in the calculations. The dependence of the position and width of resonances on the polarization potential is clearly shown in figure 3 in their work and was also discussed in some of our previous works [29,31]. Quantitatively, the present experimental ICS data agree very well with our calculated results using both the MCOP and IAM-AR, and with the SMCPP+Born ICS of Krupa et al [24] while the IAM-SCAR calculations [24] overestimate systematically our experimental data.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The singlecenter expansion of such interaction potentials for the nuclei lying couple of angstrons away from the origin would require hundreds of partial waves to be included, which is not feasible for our present computational facilities. Thus the differences seen between the MCOP calculation and experiments are essentially due to the lack of convergence in the partial-wave expansion of the scattering wave functions [31]. In contrast, the electron-nuclei interaction is well represented by the IAM since the multicentric nature of the interaction potential is used in these calculations [59].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The inclusion of higher partial waves was accomplished in the same manner as mentioned in [37,38]. The codes for this task were not originally implemented in ePSE3, but this was already made in another suite that we have extensively used in previous works of our group [37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45].…”
Section: Theory and Numerical Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%